HNDL vs. VSCGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HNDL (Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF) and VSCGX (Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, HNDL returned 5.15%/yr vs 5.40%/yr for VSCGX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HNDL charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VSCGX.

Performance

HNDL vs. VSCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL) and Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNDL achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly higher than VSCGX's 5.19% return.

HNDL

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 7.41%
• 6M: 6.83%
• 1Y: 15.95%
• 3Y*: 12.14%
• 5Y*: 5.15%
• 10Y*: —

VSCGX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 1.74%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 6M: 5.55%
• 1Y: 13.73%
• 3Y*: 12.23%
• 5Y*: 5.40%
• 10Y*: 6.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HNDL vs. VSCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HNDL Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF	7.41%	10.76%	10.66%	13.28%	-19.12%	9.06%	12.03%	15.66%	-5.88%
VSCGX Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund	5.19%	12.87%	11.65%	12.72%	-15.00%	6.04%	11.51%	15.69%	-4.53%

Correlation

The correlation between HNDL and VSCGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018	0.80

The correlation between HNDL and VSCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

HNDL vs. VSCGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HNDL	VSCGX
Financial Services	89.8%	16.1%
Technology	22.7%	27.4%
Energy	16.4%	4.3%
Utilities	15.3%	2.7%
Real Estate	9.8%	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	9.4%
Communication Services	6.2%	8.0%
Healthcare	6.1%	8.3%
Industrials	5.0%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.8%
Basic Materials	1.2%	4.3%

Return for Risk

HNDL vs. VSCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNDL

HNDL Risk / Return Rank: 68
HNDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
HNDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
HNDL Omega Ratio Rank: 69
HNDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
HNDL Martin Ratio Rank: 72

VSCGX

VSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 59
VSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
VSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
VSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
VSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
VSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNDL vs. VSCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL) and Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HNDL	VSCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.29	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	3.34	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.44	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	2.73	+0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.30	11.93	+1.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HNDL vs. VSCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the VSCGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNDL and VSCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HNDL	VSCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	2.29	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.70	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.85	-0.31

Drawdowns

HNDL vs. VSCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNDL drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, smaller than the maximum VSCGX drawdown of -30.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNDL and VSCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HNDL	VSCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.72%	-30.62%	+6.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.96%	-5.19%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.25%	-6.71%	-5.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.72%	-20.15%	-3.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.44%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.87%	-3.00%	-1.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.20%	1.19%	+0.01%

Volatility

HNDL vs. VSCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL) is 2.06%, while Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) has a volatility of 2.20%. This indicates that HNDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HNDL	VSCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.06%	2.20%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.58%	5.09%	+0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.33%	6.18%	+1.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.50%	7.70%	+3.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.74%	7.37%	+3.37%

HNDL vs. VSCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HNDL has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than VSCGX's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

HNDL vs. VSCGX - Dividend Comparison

HNDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than VSCGX's 5.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HNDL Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF	6.77%	6.86%	7.02%	6.78%	7.87%	6.86%	6.21%	5.27%	6.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VSCGX Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund	5.27%	5.50%	11.03%	5.23%	2.79%	4.18%	3.28%	2.62%	3.81%	1.65%	2.43%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HNDL and VSCGX in my portfolio?

HNDL and VSCGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HNDL or VSCGX?

VSCGX has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to HNDL (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HNDL dropped -23.72% vs VSCGX's -30.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VSCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.