HMYY vs. CHPY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF) and CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CHPY.

Performance

HMYY vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF (HMYY) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMYY achieves a -42.42% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 55.50% return.

HMYY

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -6.16%
• 6M: -29.83%
• YTD: -42.42%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CHPY

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -11.10%
• 6M: 39.35%
• YTD: 55.50%
• 1Y: 93.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 95.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	$53.10M	$56.24M	$62.00M
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF	$25.83K	$28.94K	$30.21K

HMYY vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF	-42.42%	-16.23%
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	55.50%	2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between HMYY and CHPY is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

HMYY vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HMYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CHPY

CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 89
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HMYY vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF (HMYY) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HMYY	CHPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.41	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.82	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.33	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.63	—

Drawdowns

HMYY vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMYY drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -27.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMYY and CHPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMYY	CHPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.88%	-27.64%	-29.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-27.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.89%	-20.81%	-33.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.43%	-3.03%	-40.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HMYY	CHPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.78%	38.28%	-8.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.78%	39.15%	-9.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.78%	39.15%	-9.37%

HMYY vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

HMYY vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

HMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 132.47%, more than CHPY's 38.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	38.69%	28.19%
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF	132.47%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HMYY and CHPY in my portfolio?

HMYY and CHPY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HMYY or CHPY?

On fees, CHPY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HMYY or CHPY?

CHPY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for HMYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HMYY or CHPY?

HMYY has the higher dividend yield at 132.47%, compared with 38.69% for CHPY.

What is the main difference between HMYY and CHPY?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for HMYY and 0.99% for CHPY.