HMXJ.L vs. LGAG.L
HMXJ.L (HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF) and LGAG.L (L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, from HSBC and Legal & General respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HMXJ.L returned 6.07%/yr vs 5.68%/yr for LGAG.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HMXJ.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGAG.L.
Performance
HMXJ.L vs. LGAG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HMXJ.L having a 8.91% return and LGAG.L slightly lower at 8.78%.
HMXJ.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 17.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 8.45%
LGAG.L
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 17.23%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- —
HMXJ.L vs. LGAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMXJ.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 8.91% | 12.37% | 6.43% | 0.38% | 5.35% | 5.41% | 3.21% | 13.89% | -0.10% |
LGAG.L L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 8.78% | 12.56% | 6.20% | -0.81% | 5.61% | 4.15% | 4.80% | 14.08% | -22.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMXJ.L and LGAG.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2018 | 0.95 |
The correlation between HMXJ.L and LGAG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
HMXJ.L vs. LGAG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMXJ.L
LGAG.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
HMXJ.L
LGAG.L
Basic Materials
HMXJ.L
LGAG.L
Industrials
HMXJ.L
LGAG.L
Real Estate
HMXJ.L
LGAG.L
Consumer Cyclical
HMXJ.L
LGAG.L
Utilities
HMXJ.L
LGAG.L
Healthcare
HMXJ.L
LGAG.L
Consumer Defensive
HMXJ.L
LGAG.L
Energy
HMXJ.L
LGAG.L
Communication Services
HMXJ.L
LGAG.L
Technology
HMXJ.L
LGAG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMXJ.L vs. LGAG.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMXJ.L
LGAG.L
HMXJ.L vs. LGAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMXJ.L | LGAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 2.37 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 6.97 | +0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMXJ.L | LGAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.55 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.28 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.16 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
HMXJ.L vs. LGAG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -32.30%, smaller than the maximum LGAG.L drawdown of -35.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMXJ.L and LGAG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMXJ.L | LGAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.30% | -35.16% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -7.24% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.47% | -24.83% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.65% | -24.83% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -3.09% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.74% | -10.11% | +3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 2.47% | -0.09% |
Volatility
HMXJ.L vs. LGAG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) is 3.58%, while L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that HMXJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMXJ.L | LGAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 3.98% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.32% | 8.63% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 11.11% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 20.57% | -6.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 22.27% | -6.15% |
HMXJ.L vs. LGAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMXJ.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than LGAG.L's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMXJ.L vs. LGAG.L - Dividend Comparison
HMXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while LGAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMXJ.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 3.02% | 3.43% | 3.80% | 4.13% | 3.79% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 3.23% | 3.32% | 4.03% |
LGAG.L L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, HMXJ.L and LGAG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LGAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HMXJ.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HMXJ.L and 0.10% for LGAG.L.
Find the right allocation for HMXJ.L and LGAG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer