HMSIX vs. MLPA

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

HMSIX (Hennessy Midstream Fund) and MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) are both funds - HMSIX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Hennessy, while MLPA is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. Over the past 5 years, HMSIX returned 21.26%/yr vs 18.11%/yr for MLPA. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HMSIX charges 1.51%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for MLPA.

Performance

HMSIX vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMSIX achieves a 18.54% return, which is significantly lower than MLPA's 21.83% return.

HMSIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.31%
• 6M: 10.00%
• YTD: 18.54%
• 1Y: 18.57%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: 21.26%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.25%

MLPA

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 6.27%
• 6M: 14.54%
• YTD: 21.83%
• 1Y: 20.93%
• 3Y*: 16.99%
• 5Y*: 18.11%
• 10Y*: 6.71%
• ALL TIME*: 4.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HMSIX Hennessy Midstream Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	$8.12M	$8.66M	$10.73M

HMSIX vs. MLPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HMSIX Hennessy Midstream Fund	18.54%	-0.49%	36.21%	23.75%	29.15%	36.58%	-31.00%	11.97%	-20.24%
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	21.83%	5.73%	20.35%	15.93%	27.03%	39.64%	-33.97%	11.91%	-19.94%

Correlation

The correlation between HMSIX and MLPA is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.90

The correlation between HMSIX and MLPA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HMSIX vs. MLPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HMSIX

HMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 50
HMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
HMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
HMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
HMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
HMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

MLPA

MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 64
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HMSIX vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HMSIX	MLPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.53	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	2.17	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.26	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	2.46	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.95	6.61	-0.66

HMSIX vs. MLPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the MLPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMSIX and MLPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HMSIX vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMSIX drawdown since its inception was -68.43%, smaller than the maximum MLPA drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMSIX and MLPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMSIX	MLPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.43%	-78.75%	+10.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.93%	-7.73%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.29%	-14.20%	-2.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.17%	-18.75%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.35%	0.00%	-3.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.08%	-20.08%	+8.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	3.18%	-0.01%

Volatility

HMSIX vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) at 4.14%. This indicates that HMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HMSIX	MLPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.55%	4.14%	+1.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.34%	9.72%	+2.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.19%	12.47%	+2.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.91%	17.73%	+2.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.21%	27.39%	+1.82%

HMSIX vs. MLPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMSIX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPA's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

HMSIX vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison

HMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than MLPA's 6.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HMSIX Hennessy Midstream Fund	7.38%	8.42%	7.74%	9.70%	10.84%	12.61%	15.17%	9.10%	4.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	6.93%	7.82%	7.25%	7.49%	7.30%	8.72%	13.84%	9.09%	10.00%	8.05%	7.15%	9.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HMSIX and MLPA in my portfolio?

HMSIX and MLPA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HMSIX or MLPA?

HMSIX has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to MLPA (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMSIX dropped -68.43% vs MLPA's -78.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MLPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.