PortfoliosLab logo
HMSIX vs. MLPX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HMSIX and MLPX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HMSIX vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HMSIX:

0.91

MLPX:

1.41

Sortino Ratio

HMSIX:

1.18

MLPX:

1.75

Omega Ratio

HMSIX:

1.17

MLPX:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

HMSIX:

1.10

MLPX:

1.73

Martin Ratio

HMSIX:

3.50

MLPX:

5.66

Ulcer Index

HMSIX:

5.11%

MLPX:

5.11%

Daily Std Dev

HMSIX:

21.26%

MLPX:

21.33%

Max Drawdown

HMSIX:

-67.20%

MLPX:

-70.61%

Current Drawdown

HMSIX:

-8.91%

MLPX:

-7.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMSIX achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 2.39% return.


HMSIX

YTD

1.16%

1M

3.77%

6M

-5.07%

1Y

20.57%

3Y*

19.73%

5Y*

24.48%

10Y*

N/A

MLPX

YTD

2.39%

1M

2.37%

6M

-3.51%

1Y

27.64%

3Y*

17.36%

5Y*

25.83%

10Y*

6.73%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Hennessy Midstream Fund

HMSIX vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMSIX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HMSIX vs. MLPX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMSIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HMSIX is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HMSIX is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HMSIX is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HMSIX is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HMSIX is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HMSIX is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MLPX is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MLPX is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MLPX is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MLPX is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MLPX is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MLPX is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HMSIX vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the MLPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMSIX and MLPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

HMSIX vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison

HMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than MLPX's 4.56% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HMSIX
Hennessy Midstream Fund
7.81%7.76%9.72%10.86%12.63%15.20%9.12%2.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.56%4.30%5.22%5.23%5.98%8.32%5.78%5.98%4.36%5.50%4.81%2.15%

Drawdowns

HMSIX vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMSIX drawdown since its inception was -67.20%, roughly equal to the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMSIX and MLPX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

HMSIX vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) at 3.78%. This indicates that HMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...