HMSFX vs. HMSIX
HMSFX (Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class) and HMSIX (Hennessy Midstream Fund) are both mutual funds - HMSFX is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian US Midstream Energy Index, while HMSIX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Hennessy. Over the past 5 years, HMSFX returned 19.37%/yr vs 19.67%/yr for HMSIX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HMSFX charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for HMSIX.
Performance
HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HMSFX having a 16.30% return and HMSIX slightly higher at 16.42%.
HMSFX
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 6M
- 15.01%
- 1Y
- 15.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.48%
- 5Y*
- 19.37%
- 10Y*
- —
HMSIX
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- 16.42%
- 6M
- 15.10%
- 1Y
- 15.99%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- 19.67%
- 10Y*
- —
HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMSFX Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class | 16.30% | -0.76% | 35.85% | 23.50% | 28.88% | 36.22% | -31.21% | 11.77% | -20.36% |
HMSIX Hennessy Midstream Fund | 16.42% | -0.49% | 36.21% | 23.75% | 29.15% | 36.58% | -31.00% | 11.97% | -20.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMSFX and HMSIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 1.00 |
The correlation between HMSFX and HMSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMSFX vs. HMSIX — Risk / Return Rank
HMSFX
HMSIX
HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class (HMSFX) and Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMSFX | HMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.89 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.20 | 4.36 | -0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMSFX | HMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.87 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.98 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.36 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMSFX drawdown since its inception was -68.50%, roughly equal to the maximum HMSIX drawdown of -68.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMSFX and HMSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMSFX | HMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.50% | -68.43% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.98% | -6.93% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.38% | -16.29% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.17% | -21.17% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.02% | -5.08% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.41% | -12.25% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 3.82% | +0.07% |
Volatility
HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Volatility Comparison
Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class (HMSFX) and Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) have volatilities of 6.12% and 6.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMSFX | HMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 6.20% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.63% | 11.62% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.17% | 15.10% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 20.26% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.40% | 29.41% | -0.01% |
HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMSFX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HMSIX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Dividend Comparison
HMSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than HMSIX's 7.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMSFX Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class | 7.96% | 8.89% | 8.12% | 10.11% | 11.23% | 12.99% | 15.54% | 9.26% | 4.74% |
HMSIX Hennessy Midstream Fund | 7.51% | 8.42% | 7.74% | 9.70% | 10.84% | 12.61% | 15.17% | 9.10% | 4.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, HMSFX and HMSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HMSIX has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to HMSFX (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMSFX dropped -68.50% vs HMSIX's -68.43%.
HMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HMSFX and HMSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer