PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMSFX vs. HMSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class (HMSFX) and Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HMSFX having a 16.30% return and HMSIX slightly higher at 16.42%.


HMSFX

1D
1.49%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
16.30%
6M
15.01%
1Y
15.66%
3Y*
21.48%
5Y*
19.37%
10Y*

HMSIX

1D
1.48%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
16.42%
6M
15.10%
1Y
15.99%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
19.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HMSFX
Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class
16.30%-0.76%35.85%23.50%28.88%36.22%-31.21%11.77%-20.36%
HMSIX
Hennessy Midstream Fund
16.42%-0.49%36.21%23.75%29.15%36.58%-31.00%11.97%-20.24%

Correlation

The correlation between HMSFX and HMSIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018

1.00

The correlation between HMSFX and HMSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMSFX vs. HMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMSFX
HMSFX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
HMSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
HMSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

HMSIX
HMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
HMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class (HMSFX) and Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMSFXHMSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.89

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

4.36

-0.16

HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMSFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the HMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMSFX and HMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMSFXHMSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.87

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.98

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.36

-0.01

Drawdowns

HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMSFX drawdown since its inception was -68.50%, roughly equal to the maximum HMSIX drawdown of -68.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMSFX and HMSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMSFXHMSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.50%

-68.43%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.98%

-6.93%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.38%

-16.29%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.17%

-21.17%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.02%

-5.08%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.41%

-12.25%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

3.82%

+0.07%

Volatility

HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class (HMSFX) and Hennessy Midstream Fund (HMSIX) have volatilities of 6.12% and 6.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMSFXHMSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

6.20%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

11.62%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

15.10%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

20.26%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.40%

29.41%

-0.01%

HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMSFX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HMSIX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMSFX vs. HMSIX - Dividend Comparison

HMSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than HMSIX's 7.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HMSFX
Hennessy Midstream Fund Investor Class
7.96%8.89%8.12%10.11%11.23%12.99%15.54%9.26%4.74%
HMSIX
Hennessy Midstream Fund
7.51%8.42%7.74%9.70%10.84%12.61%15.17%9.10%4.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, HMSFX and HMSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HMSIX has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to HMSFX (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMSFX dropped -68.50% vs HMSIX's -68.43%.

HMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMSFX and HMSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer