HMOP vs. ROSC
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC).
HMOP and ROSC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HMOP is an actively managed fund by Hartford. It was launched on Dec 13, 2017. ROSC is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. It was launched on Mar 24, 2015.
Performance
HMOP vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HMOP vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | -0.10% | 4.70% | 2.52% | 6.83% | -8.37% | 1.80% | 5.52% | 7.77% | 1.59% | 0.05% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 3.15% | 10.18% | 7.28% | 18.88% | -10.58% | 31.37% | 5.27% | 17.09% | -12.38% | 3.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMOP achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than ROSC's 3.15% return.
HMOP
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.32%
- 10Y*
- —
ROSC
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 7.48%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HMOP vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMOP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HMOP vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank
HMOP
ROSC
HMOP vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMOP | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.77 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.91 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.83 | 7.26 | -2.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMOP | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.36 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.43 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between HMOP and ROSC is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HMOP vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison
HMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than ROSC's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | 3.51% | 3.40% | 3.22% | 2.92% | 2.12% | 1.67% | 5.26% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 2.03% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.13% | 2.20% | 2.48% |
Drawdowns
HMOP vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMOP drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, smaller than the maximum ROSC drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMOP and ROSC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMOP | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.12% | -43.13% | +30.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | -11.91% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.12% | -23.74% | +10.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.38% | -5.31% | +2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -7.31% | +4.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 3.13% | -2.19% |
Volatility
HMOP vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) is 1.08%, while Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that HMOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HMOP | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 5.24% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.78% | 11.14% | -9.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73% | 19.29% | -15.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.85% | 19.41% | -15.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.29% | 20.26% | -15.97% |