HMOP vs. ROSC
HMOP (Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF) and ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HMOP is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Hartford, while ROSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. HMOP is actively managed, while ROSC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HMOP returned 1.00%/yr vs 10.37%/yr for ROSC. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HMOP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ROSC.
Performance
HMOP vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMOP achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than ROSC's 21.44% return.
HMOP
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.54%
ROSC
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 14.44%
- YTD
- 21.44%
- 1Y
- 40.60%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.82M | $2.90M | $2.81M | |
| $136.27K | $122.07K | $123.34K |
HMOP vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | 0.45% | 4.70% | 2.52% | 6.83% | -8.37% | 1.80% | 5.52% | 7.77% | 1.59% | 0.05% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 21.44% | 10.18% | 7.28% | 18.88% | -10.58% | 31.37% | 5.27% | 17.09% | -12.38% | 2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMOP and ROSC is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2017 | 0.04 |
Over the past year, HMOP and ROSC have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMOP vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank
HMOP
ROSC
HMOP vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HMOP | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.48 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 5.26 | -3.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | 17.73 | -13.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HMOP vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMOP drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, smaller than the maximum ROSC drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMOP and ROSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMOP | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.12% | -43.13% | +30.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.70% | -7.75% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.94% | -23.74% | +19.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.04% | -23.74% | +10.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -0.42% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -7.12% | +4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 2.30% | -1.39% |
Volatility
HMOP vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) is 0.80%, while Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that HMOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMOP | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | 3.55% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.05% | 10.12% | -8.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68% | 15.09% | -12.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.89% | 19.21% | -15.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.24% | 20.25% | -16.01% |
HMOP vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMOP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMOP vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison
HMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than ROSC's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMOP Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | 3.55% | 3.40% | 3.22% | 2.92% | 2.12% | 1.67% | 5.26% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.77% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.13% | 2.20% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMOP and ROSC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROSC has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to HMOP (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMOP dropped -13.12% vs ROSC's -43.13%.
On 5-year performance, ROSC leads with 10.37% vs 1.00% for HMOP. On fees, HMOP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HMOP has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 10.37% return vs 1.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HMOP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.
HMOP has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 1.77% for ROSC.
HMOP is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while ROSC is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HMOP and 0.34% for ROSC.
ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HMOP and ROSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer