HMJD.L vs. CNKY.L
HMJD.L (HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF) and CNKY.L (iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Japan Equities funds - HMJD.L tracks the HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF while CNKY.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMJD.L returned 9.30%/yr vs 11.66%/yr for CNKY.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HMJD.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for CNKY.L.
Performance
HMJD.L vs. CNKY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HMJD.L is traded in USD, while CNKY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNKY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMJD.L achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly lower than CNKY.L's 30.57% return. Over the past 10 years, HMJD.L has underperformed CNKY.L with an annualized return of 9.30%, while CNKY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.66% annualized return.
HMJD.L
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 35.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
CNKY.L
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- 6M
- 22.94%
- YTD
- 30.57%
- 1Y
- 58.52%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
HMJD.L vs. CNKY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMJD.L HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF | 15.59% | 26.14% | 7.23% | 20.68% | -17.07% | 0.77% | 16.33% | 18.26% | -13.65% | 24.43% |
CNKY.L iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) | 30.57% | 29.74% | 7.33% | 21.09% | -20.09% | -5.05% | 24.90% | 21.05% | -9.42% | 25.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMJD.L and CNKY.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2010 | 0.86 |
The correlation between HMJD.L and CNKY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMJD.L vs. CNKY.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMJD.L
CNKY.L
HMJD.L vs. CNKY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF (HMJD.L) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HMJD.L | CNKY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 3.81 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.93 | 11.92 | -3.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HMJD.L vs. CNKY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMJD.L drawdown since its inception was -32.38%, smaller than the maximum CNKY.L drawdown of -99.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMJD.L and CNKY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMJD.L | CNKY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.38% | -99.39% | +67.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.71% | -15.28% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.76% | -19.43% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.38% | -34.29% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.38% | -36.20% | +3.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.52% | -97.11% | +92.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -95.37% | +86.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 4.89% | -0.94% |
Volatility
HMJD.L vs. CNKY.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF (HMJD.L) is 7.08%, while iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that HMJD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNKY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMJD.L | CNKY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 9.89% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.96% | 22.01% | -4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.58% | 26.83% | -5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 20.56% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 18.73% | -1.63% |
HMJD.L vs. CNKY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMJD.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CNKY.L's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMJD.L vs. CNKY.L - Dividend Comparison
HMJD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while CNKY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNKY.L iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMJD.L HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.66% | 1.72% | 2.06% | 1.56% | 1.57% | 1.77% | 1.84% | 1.35% | 1.40% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMJD.L and CNKY.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMJD.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMJD.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for CNKY.L.
HMJD.L tracks HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF, while CNKY.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HMJD.L and 0.48% for CNKY.L.
Find the right allocation for HMJD.L and CNKY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer