HMEF.L vs. XMMS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HMEF.L (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD) and XMMS.L (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from HSBC and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HMEF.L returned 5.72%/yr vs 8.45%/yr for XMMS.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HMEF.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMMS.L.

Performance

HMEF.L vs. XMMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HMEF.L having a 25.52% return and XMMS.L slightly higher at 26.72%.

HMEF.L

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: 6.53%
• YTD: 25.52%
• 6M: 27.29%
• 1Y: 51.20%
• 3Y*: 17.76%
• 5Y*: 5.72%
• 10Y*: 8.47%

XMMS.L

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: 6.34%
• YTD: 26.72%
• 6M: 27.92%
• 1Y: 53.72%
• 3Y*: 20.94%
• 5Y*: 8.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMEF.L vs. XMMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD	25.52%	21.88%	6.43%	-0.16%	-12.59%	-4.10%	12.68%	10.34%	-9.38%
XMMS.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C	26.72%	24.71%	9.13%	2.81%	-10.67%	-1.61%	13.55%	14.48%	-8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between HMEF.L and XMMS.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2018	0.94

The correlation between HMEF.L and XMMS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

HMEF.L vs. XMMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HMEF.L	XMMS.L
Technology	42.9%	36.9%
Financial Services	17.8%	19.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	9.6%
Industrials	6.8%	7.4%
Communication Services	6.2%	7.0%
Basic Materials	5.9%	6.5%
Energy	3.5%	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	3.0%
Healthcare	2.6%	2.9%
Utilities	1.9%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.1%

Return for Risk

HMEF.L vs. XMMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMEF.L

HMEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
HMEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
HMEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
HMEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
HMEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

XMMS.L

XMMS.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
XMMS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XMMS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
XMMS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XMMS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XMMS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMEF.L vs. XMMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HMEF.L	XMMS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.99	3.17	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.88	4.07	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.58	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.60	4.84	-0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.90	17.09	-1.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HMEF.L vs. XMMS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the XMMS.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMEF.L and XMMS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HMEF.L	XMMS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.99	3.17	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.53	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.45	-0.17

Drawdowns

HMEF.L vs. XMMS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMEF.L drawdown since its inception was -32.91%, which is greater than XMMS.L's maximum drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMEF.L and XMMS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMEF.L	XMMS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.91%	-27.76%	-5.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.07%	-11.04%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.40%	-15.26%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.99%	-24.32%	-2.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.56%	-2.42%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.28%	-10.00%	-2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	3.13%	+0.08%

Volatility

HMEF.L vs. XMMS.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L) have volatilities of 7.42% and 7.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HMEF.L	XMMS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.42%	7.37%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.61%	14.36%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.04%	16.90%	+0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.23%	16.56%	-0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.92%	18.84%	-0.92%

HMEF.L vs. XMMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMEF.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HMEF.L vs. XMMS.L - Dividend Comparison

HMEF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while XMMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%
XMMS.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HMEF.L and XMMS.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, HMEF.L and XMMS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, HMEF.L or XMMS.L?

On fees, HMEF.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HMEF.L or XMMS.L?

HMEF.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XMMS.L.

What is the main difference between HMEF.L and XMMS.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for HMEF.L and 0.18% for XMMS.L.