HMEF.L vs. VDEM.L
HMEF.L (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD) and VDEM.L (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - HMEF.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while VDEM.L tracks the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMEF.L returned 44.84%/yr vs 7.71%/yr for VDEM.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HMEF.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VDEM.L.
Performance
HMEF.L vs. VDEM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HMEF.L is traded in GBp, while VDEM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VDEM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMEF.L achieves a 20.01% return, which is significantly higher than VDEM.L's 9.65% return. Over the past 10 years, HMEF.L has outperformed VDEM.L with an annualized return of 44.84%, while VDEM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.71% annualized return.
HMEF.L
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -6.61%
- 6M
- 13.86%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 1Y
- 37.04%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 44.84%
VDEM.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 20.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
HMEF.L vs. VDEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 20.01% | 24.56% | 9.08% | 2.44% | -10.01% | -2.27% | 14.81% | 12.75% | -9.63% | 101.42% |
VDEM.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS | 9.65% | 16.95% | 14.24% | 1.91% | -7.35% | 0.05% | 11.48% | 14.31% | -7.36% | 20.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMEF.L and VDEM.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012 | 0.93 |
The correlation between HMEF.L and VDEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
HMEF.L vs. VDEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMEF.L
VDEM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
HMEF.L
VDEM.L
Financial Services
HMEF.L
VDEM.L
Consumer Cyclical
HMEF.L
VDEM.L
Industrials
HMEF.L
VDEM.L
Communication Services
HMEF.L
VDEM.L
Basic Materials
HMEF.L
VDEM.L
Energy
HMEF.L
VDEM.L
Healthcare
HMEF.L
VDEM.L
Consumer Defensive
HMEF.L
VDEM.L
Utilities
HMEF.L
VDEM.L
Real Estate
HMEF.L
VDEM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMEF.L vs. VDEM.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMEF.L
VDEM.L
HMEF.L vs. VDEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS (VDEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HMEF.L | VDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 2.32 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | 6.80 | +3.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HMEF.L vs. VDEM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMEF.L drawdown since its inception was -27.33%, smaller than the maximum VDEM.L drawdown of -32.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMEF.L and VDEM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMEF.L | VDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.33% | -32.15% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.07% | -8.99% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.16% | -14.89% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | -19.51% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.33% | -25.47% | -1.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.44% | -4.87% | -4.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -8.62% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 3.08% | +0.59% |
Volatility
HMEF.L vs. VDEM.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) has a higher volatility of 8.82% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS (VDEM.L) at 5.21%. This indicates that HMEF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMEF.L | VDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.82% | 5.21% | +3.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.56% | 13.57% | +3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.59% | 16.07% | +3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 16.47% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.57% | 18.08% | +124.49% |
HMEF.L vs. VDEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMEF.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VDEM.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HMEF.L vs. VDEM.L - Dividend Comparison
HMEF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than VDEM.L's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 1.70% | 1.98% | 2.43% | 2.58% | 2.99% | 2.01% | 1.66% | 2.11% | 2.14% | 37.43% | 168.62% | 225.12% |
VDEM.L Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS | 2.07% | 2.34% | 2.38% | 2.58% | 3.27% | 2.30% | 1.81% | 2.33% | 2.82% | 2.16% | 2.40% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMEF.L and VDEM.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMEF.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMEF.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VDEM.L.
HMEF.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while VDEM.L tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for HMEF.L and 0.22% for VDEM.L.
Find the right allocation for HMEF.L and VDEM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer