HMEF.L vs. PRIJ.L
HMEF.L (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD) and PRIJ.L (Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both exchange-traded funds - HMEF.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while PRIJ.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HMEF.L returned 5.72%/yr vs 8.08%/yr for PRIJ.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HMEF.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRIJ.L.
Performance
HMEF.L vs. PRIJ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMEF.L achieves a 25.52% return, which is significantly higher than PRIJ.L's 15.18% return.
HMEF.L
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 25.52%
- 6M
- 27.29%
- 1Y
- 51.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
PRIJ.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 6.51%
- YTD
- 15.18%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 30.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- —
HMEF.L vs. PRIJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 25.52% | 21.88% | 6.43% | -0.16% | -12.59% | -4.10% | 12.68% | 6.66% |
PRIJ.L Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) | 15.18% | 15.76% | 7.02% | 11.63% | -8.38% | 0.73% | 10.33% | 11.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMEF.L and PRIJ.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2019 | 0.50 |
HMEF.L vs. PRIJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMEF.L
PRIJ.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
HMEF.L
PRIJ.L
Financial Services
HMEF.L
PRIJ.L
Consumer Cyclical
HMEF.L
PRIJ.L
Industrials
HMEF.L
PRIJ.L
Communication Services
HMEF.L
PRIJ.L
Basic Materials
HMEF.L
PRIJ.L
Energy
HMEF.L
PRIJ.L
Consumer Defensive
HMEF.L
PRIJ.L
Healthcare
HMEF.L
PRIJ.L
Utilities
HMEF.L
PRIJ.L
Real Estate
HMEF.L
PRIJ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMEF.L vs. PRIJ.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMEF.L
PRIJ.L
HMEF.L vs. PRIJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMEF.L | PRIJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.31 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.60 | 2.74 | +1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.90 | 8.55 | +7.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMEF.L | PRIJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | 1.62 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.51 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.51 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
HMEF.L vs. PRIJ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMEF.L drawdown since its inception was -32.91%, which is greater than PRIJ.L's maximum drawdown of -25.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMEF.L and PRIJ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMEF.L | PRIJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.91% | -25.61% | -7.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.07% | -10.99% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.40% | -14.07% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.99% | -19.56% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.56% | -0.06% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.28% | -6.14% | -6.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.53% | -0.32% |
Volatility
HMEF.L vs. PRIJ.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L) at 4.95%. This indicates that HMEF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRIJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMEF.L | PRIJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 4.95% | +2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.61% | 15.05% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.04% | 18.59% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 15.75% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 16.77% | +1.15% |
HMEF.L vs. PRIJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMEF.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIJ.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HMEF.L vs. PRIJ.L - Dividend Comparison
HMEF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while PRIJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
PRIJ.L Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMEF.L and PRIJ.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRIJ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRIJ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for HMEF.L.
HMEF.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PRIJ.L is Japan Equities. HMEF.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while PRIJ.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for HMEF.L and 0.05% for PRIJ.L.
Find the right allocation for HMEF.L and PRIJ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer