HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L
HMCX.L (HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP) and SPOL.L (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - HMCX.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP while SPOL.L tracks the MSCI Poland NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMCX.L returned 2.70%/yr vs 10.28%/yr for SPOL.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HMCX.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for SPOL.L.
Performance
HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMCX.L achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly lower than SPOL.L's 15.71% return. Over the past 10 years, HMCX.L has underperformed SPOL.L with an annualized return of 2.70%, while SPOL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.
HMCX.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 4.02%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.70%
SPOL.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 6.57%
- YTD
- 15.71%
- 6M
- 25.23%
- 1Y
- 43.43%
- 3Y*
- 30.33%
- 5Y*
- 15.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMCX.L HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP | 4.02% | 8.36% | 3.93% | 4.54% | -19.69% | 13.90% | -7.19% | 25.24% | -15.88% | 14.31% |
SPOL.L iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 15.71% | 61.27% | -4.98% | 41.52% | -17.96% | 8.30% | -14.19% | -9.68% | -7.69% | 40.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMCX.L and SPOL.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2011 | 0.45 |
HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMCX.L
SPOL.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
HMCX.L
SPOL.L
Financial Services
HMCX.L
SPOL.L
Consumer Cyclical
HMCX.L
SPOL.L
Real Estate
HMCX.L
SPOL.L
-
Technology
HMCX.L
SPOL.L
Basic Materials
HMCX.L
SPOL.L
Consumer Defensive
HMCX.L
SPOL.L
Communication Services
HMCX.L
SPOL.L
Healthcare
HMCX.L
SPOL.L
-
Utilities
HMCX.L
SPOL.L
Energy
HMCX.L
SPOL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMCX.L
SPOL.L
HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMCX.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.31 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 4.54 | -3.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.76 | 10.87 | -8.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMCX.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 1.87 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.55 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.40 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.16 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum SPOL.L drawdown of -56.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMCX.L and SPOL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMCX.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.87% | -56.64% | +14.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.19% | -9.51% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.36% | -19.47% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.75% | -46.27% | +14.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.87% | -56.64% | +14.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.53% | -0.53% | -5.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -21.79% | +12.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 3.98% | -0.42% |
Volatility
HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) is 4.57%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that HMCX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMCX.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 7.21% | -2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 17.30% | -6.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 23.13% | -9.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.08% | 27.10% | -12.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 25.42% | -9.25% |
HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMCX.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Dividend Comparison
HMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while SPOL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMCX.L HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
SPOL.L iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMCX.L and SPOL.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMCX.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMCX.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.
HMCX.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HMCX.L and 0.74% for SPOL.L.
Find the right allocation for HMCX.L and SPOL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer