PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMCX.L achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly lower than SPOL.L's 15.71% return. Over the past 10 years, HMCX.L has underperformed SPOL.L with an annualized return of 2.70%, while SPOL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.


HMCX.L

1D
0.46%
1M
4.18%
YTD
4.02%
6M
5.81%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
6.41%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
2.70%

SPOL.L

1D
0.64%
1M
6.57%
YTD
15.71%
6M
25.23%
1Y
43.43%
3Y*
30.33%
5Y*
15.01%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMCX.L
HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP
4.02%8.36%3.93%4.54%-19.69%13.90%-7.19%25.24%-15.88%14.31%
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
15.71%61.27%-4.98%41.52%-17.96%8.30%-14.19%-9.68%-7.69%40.45%

Correlation

The correlation between HMCX.L and SPOL.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2011

0.45

HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HMCX.L
SPOL.L

Industrials

19.9%
1.9%

Financial Services

19.5%
48.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
10.9%

Real Estate

9.5%

-

Technology

9.0%
2.2%

Basic Materials

6.7%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
5.4%

Communication Services

5.9%
3.2%

Healthcare

4.4%

-

Utilities

3.0%
2.0%

Energy

2.5%
16.7%

Industrials

HMCX.L
19.9%
SPOL.L
1.9%

Financial Services

HMCX.L
19.5%
SPOL.L
48.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HMCX.L
13.4%
SPOL.L
10.9%

Real Estate

HMCX.L
9.5%
SPOL.L

-

Technology

HMCX.L
9.0%
SPOL.L
2.2%

Basic Materials

HMCX.L
6.7%
SPOL.L
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

HMCX.L
6.2%
SPOL.L
5.4%

Communication Services

HMCX.L
5.9%
SPOL.L
3.2%

Healthcare

HMCX.L
4.4%
SPOL.L

-

Utilities

HMCX.L
3.0%
SPOL.L
2.0%

Energy

HMCX.L
2.5%
SPOL.L
16.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMCX.L
HMCX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
HMCX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SPOL.L
SPOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMCX.LSPOL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.31

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

4.54

-3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.76

10.87

-8.11

HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMCX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMCX.L and SPOL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMCX.LSPOL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.87

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.55

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.40

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.16

+0.14

Drawdowns

HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum SPOL.L drawdown of -56.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMCX.L and SPOL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMCX.LSPOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-56.64%

+14.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.19%

-9.51%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.36%

-19.47%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.75%

-46.27%

+14.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.87%

-56.64%

+14.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.53%

-0.53%

-5.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-21.79%

+12.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

3.98%

-0.42%

Volatility

HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) is 4.57%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that HMCX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMCX.LSPOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

7.21%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

17.30%

-6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

23.13%

-9.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

27.10%

-12.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

25.42%

-9.25%

HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMCX.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMCX.L vs. SPOL.L - Dividend Comparison

HMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while SPOL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMCX.L
HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP
0.04%0.04%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMCX.L and SPOL.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HMCX.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMCX.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.

HMCX.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HMCX.L and 0.74% for SPOL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMCX.L and SPOL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer