PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HMCX.L vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HMCX.L and ^GSPC is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

HMCX.L vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.02%
6.72%
HMCX.L
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HMCX.L:

0.86

^GSPC:

1.62

Sortino Ratio

HMCX.L:

1.27

^GSPC:

2.20

Omega Ratio

HMCX.L:

1.16

^GSPC:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

HMCX.L:

0.61

^GSPC:

2.46

Martin Ratio

HMCX.L:

3.78

^GSPC:

10.01

Ulcer Index

HMCX.L:

2.69%

^GSPC:

2.08%

Daily Std Dev

HMCX.L:

11.82%

^GSPC:

12.88%

Max Drawdown

HMCX.L:

-41.50%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

HMCX.L:

-7.37%

^GSPC:

-2.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMCX.L achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 2.24% return. Over the past 10 years, HMCX.L has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 4.18%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.04% annualized return.


HMCX.L

YTD

0.29%

1M

0.18%

6M

-1.69%

1Y

9.85%

5Y*

1.13%

10Y*

4.18%

^GSPC

YTD

2.24%

1M

-1.20%

6M

6.72%

1Y

18.21%

5Y*

12.53%

10Y*

11.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HMCX.L vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMCX.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HMCX.L is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HMCX.L is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HMCX.L is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HMCX.L is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HMCX.L is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HMCX.L is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HMCX.L vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HMCX.L, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.761.42
The chart of Sortino ratio for HMCX.L, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.131.93
The chart of Omega ratio for HMCX.L, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.141.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for HMCX.L, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.462.12
The chart of Martin ratio for HMCX.L, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.068.60
HMCX.L
^GSPC

The current HMCX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMCX.L and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.76
1.42
HMCX.L
^GSPC

Drawdowns

HMCX.L vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -41.50%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMCX.L and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-15.46%
-2.13%
HMCX.L
^GSPC

Volatility

HMCX.L vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) is 2.75%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that HMCX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.75%
3.37%
HMCX.L
^GSPC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab