PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMCX.L vs. FTEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMCX.L vs. FTEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HMCX.L is traded in GBp, while FTEU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FTEU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMCX.L achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly lower than FTEU.L's 12.78% return.


HMCX.L

1D
0.46%
1M
4.18%
YTD
4.02%
6M
5.81%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
6.41%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
2.70%

FTEU.L

1D
0.25%
1M
3.00%
YTD
12.78%
6M
15.33%
1Y
34.02%
3Y*
22.63%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMCX.L vs. FTEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMCX.L
HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP
4.02%8.36%3.93%4.54%-19.69%13.90%-7.19%25.24%-15.88%14.31%
FTEU.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares
12.78%46.50%4.57%10.67%-9.18%12.84%1.98%15.97%-14.85%24.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HMCX.L and FTEU.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2016

0.66

The correlation between HMCX.L and FTEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

HMCX.L vs. FTEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HMCX.L
FTEU.L

Industrials

19.9%
27.4%

Financial Services

19.5%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
9.2%

Real Estate

9.5%
6.0%

Technology

9.0%
6.0%

Basic Materials

6.7%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
5.3%

Communication Services

5.9%
3.7%

Healthcare

4.4%
5.2%

Utilities

3.0%
8.3%

Energy

2.5%
10.8%

Industrials

HMCX.L
19.9%
FTEU.L
27.4%

Financial Services

HMCX.L
19.5%
FTEU.L
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HMCX.L
13.4%
FTEU.L
9.2%

Real Estate

HMCX.L
9.5%
FTEU.L
6.0%

Technology

HMCX.L
9.0%
FTEU.L
6.0%

Basic Materials

HMCX.L
6.7%
FTEU.L
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

HMCX.L
6.2%
FTEU.L
5.3%

Communication Services

HMCX.L
5.9%
FTEU.L
3.7%

Healthcare

HMCX.L
4.4%
FTEU.L
5.2%

Utilities

HMCX.L
3.0%
FTEU.L
8.3%

Energy

HMCX.L
2.5%
FTEU.L
10.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMCX.L vs. FTEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMCX.L
HMCX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
HMCX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEU.L
FTEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMCX.L vs. FTEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMCX.LFTEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.40

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

3.23

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.76

11.93

-9.17

HMCX.L vs. FTEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMCX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMCX.L and FTEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMCX.LFTEU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

2.16

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.66

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.58

-0.28

Drawdowns

HMCX.L vs. FTEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than FTEU.L's maximum drawdown of -35.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMCX.L and FTEU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMCX.LFTEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-35.87%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.19%

-10.50%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.36%

-13.83%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.75%

-24.32%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.53%

-0.15%

-5.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-6.50%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

2.84%

+0.72%

Volatility

HMCX.L vs. FTEU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) is 4.57%, while First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that HMCX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMCX.LFTEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

5.05%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

13.09%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

15.67%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

17.71%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

18.31%

-2.14%

HMCX.L vs. FTEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMCX.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTEU.L's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMCX.L vs. FTEU.L - Dividend Comparison

HMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while FTEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEU.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HMCX.L
HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP
0.04%0.04%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMCX.L and FTEU.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HMCX.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMCX.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FTEU.L.

HMCX.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while FTEU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HMCX.L and 0.80% for FTEU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMCX.L and FTEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer