PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMCNX vs. RSINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMCNX vs. RSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Mid Cap Fund (HMCNX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMCNX achieves a 14.06% return, which is significantly higher than RSINX's 6.97% return.


HMCNX

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
14.06%
6M
14.06%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*

RSINX

1D
1.44%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
6.97%
6M
7.57%
1Y
15.96%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMCNX vs. RSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HMCNX
Harbor Mid Cap Fund
14.06%9.38%7.01%16.44%-17.46%24.12%18.45%3.52%
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
6.97%6.39%20.81%13.18%-2.02%25.73%-1.68%3.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HMCNX and RSINX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.86

The correlation between HMCNX and RSINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMCNX vs. RSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMCNX
HMCNX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
HMCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HMCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

RSINX
RSINX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
RSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMCNX vs. RSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Mid Cap Fund (HMCNX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMCNXRSINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

1.83

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.84

6.51

+5.34

HMCNX vs. RSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the RSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMCNX and RSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMCNXRSINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

1.32

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.50

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.40

+0.11

Drawdowns

HMCNX vs. RSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMCNX drawdown since its inception was -38.10%, smaller than the maximum RSINX drawdown of -66.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMCNX and RSINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMCNXRSINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.10%

-66.11%

+28.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-8.64%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.80%

-20.23%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.82%

-23.08%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.90%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-10.56%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.43%

-0.10%

Volatility

HMCNX vs. RSINX - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Mid Cap Fund (HMCNX) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) at 3.02%. This indicates that HMCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMCNXRSINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

3.02%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

8.40%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.20%

12.00%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

19.13%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

19.09%

+2.22%

HMCNX vs. RSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMCNX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than RSINX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMCNX vs. RSINX - Dividend Comparison

HMCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than RSINX's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMCNX
Harbor Mid Cap Fund
2.19%2.50%0.27%1.94%2.93%1.79%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
4.17%4.46%10.21%0.77%4.03%15.89%0.30%4.32%17.89%14.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMCNX and RSINX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HMCNX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to RSINX (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMCNX dropped -38.10% vs RSINX's -66.11%.

HMCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMCNX and RSINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer