HLT vs. MGM
HLT (Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.) and MGM (MGM Resorts International) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — HLT in Lodging, MGM in Resorts & Casinos. Over the past 10 years, HLT returned 46.49%/yr vs 7.30%/yr for MGM. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
HLT vs. MGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLT achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly lower than MGM's 25.60% return. Over the past 10 years, HLT has outperformed MGM with an annualized return of 46.49%, while MGM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.30% annualized return.
HLT
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 18.06%
- 3Y*
- 28.13%
- 5Y*
- 19.92%
- 10Y*
- 46.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 36.35%
MGM
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- 6M
- 39.94%
- YTD
- 25.60%
- 1Y
- 22.51%
- 3Y*
- -3.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $729.60M | $664.10M | $660.50M | |
| $96.53M | $115.34M | $188.82M |
HLT vs. MGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 12.10% | 16.49% | 36.11% | 44.68% | -18.72% | 40.20% | 0.47% | 55.48% | -9.40% | 829.98% |
MGM MGM Resorts International | 25.60% | 5.31% | -22.45% | 33.25% | -25.27% | 42.47% | -4.56% | 39.69% | -26.16% | 17.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLT and MGM is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HLT and MGM has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
HLT:
$73.24B
MGM:
$11.73B
HLT:
$6.75
MGM:
$1.62
HLT:
47.68
MGM:
28.33
HLT:
0.77
MGM:
0.32
HLT:
6.05
MGM:
0.68
HLT:
$12.49B
MGM:
$17.76B
HLT:
$5.84B
MGM:
$5.86B
HLT:
$2.33B
MGM:
$1.57B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLT vs. MGM — Risk / Return Rank
HLT
MGM
HLT vs. MGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) and MGM Resorts International (MGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HLT | MGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.14 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 0.99 | +0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.88 | 2.08 | +1.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HLT vs. MGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLT drawdown since its inception was -50.82%, smaller than the maximum MGM drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLT and MGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLT | MGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.82% | -98.11% | +47.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -22.76% | +12.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.35% | -49.20% | +22.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.65% | -49.33% | +16.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.82% | -80.42% | +29.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.14% | -51.36% | +43.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.67% | -46.43% | +36.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 10.83% | -6.16% |
Volatility
HLT vs. MGM - Volatility Comparison
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to MGM Resorts International (MGM) at 5.42%. This indicates that HLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLT | MGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 5.42% | +1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.27% | 30.89% | -13.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.28% | 38.79% | -15.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.88% | 40.20% | -13.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 181.01% | 45.75% | +135.26% |
Dividends
HLT vs. MGM - Dividend Comparison
HLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, while MGM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.54% | 0.84% | 31.40% | 1.03% | 0.65% |
MGM MGM Resorts International | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.50% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HLT vs. MGM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and MGM Resorts International. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HLT vs. MGM - Profitability Comparison
HLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 3.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.
MGM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MGM Resorts International reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 858.00M and revenue of 3.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.
MGM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MGM Resorts International reported an operating income of 503.64M and revenue of 4.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
HLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 482.00M and revenue of 3.34B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
MGM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MGM Resorts International reported a net income of 292.43M and revenue of 4.45B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HLT and MGM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLT has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to MGM (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLT dropped -50.82% vs MGM's -98.11%.
HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HLT and MGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer