PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGM vs. BYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MGM vs. BYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MGM Resorts International (MGM) and Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGM achieves a 22.14% return, which is significantly higher than BYD's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, MGM has underperformed BYD with an annualized return of 7.08%, while BYD has yielded a comparatively higher 16.96% annualized return.


MGM

1D
-2.39%
1M
-5.37%
6M
32.89%
YTD
22.14%
1Y
24.67%
3Y*
-3.78%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
7.08%
ALL TIME*
7.70%

BYD

1D
-2.29%
1M
-3.23%
6M
1.09%
YTD
0.26%
1Y
2.60%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
16.96%
ALL TIME*
4.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$105.45M$89.68M$88.22M
$110.27M$112.61M$186.79M

MGM vs. BYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGM
MGM Resorts International
22.14%5.31%-22.45%33.25%-25.27%42.47%-4.56%39.69%-26.16%17.48%
BYD
Boyd Gaming Corporation
0.26%18.61%17.13%15.99%-15.74%52.77%43.35%45.51%-40.25%74.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MGM and BYD is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 1993

0.50

The correlation between MGM and BYD shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MGM:

$11.21B

BYD:

$6.32B

EPS

MGM:

$1.62

BYD:

$23.36

PE Ratio

MGM:

27.55

BYD:

3.64

PEG Ratio

MGM:

0.31

BYD:

0.05

PS Ratio

MGM:

0.66

BYD:

1.61

PB Ratio

MGM:

4.57

BYD:

2.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

MGM:

$17.76B

BYD:

$4.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MGM:

$5.86B

BYD:

$1.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

MGM:

$1.57B

BYD:

$2.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGM vs. BYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MGM
MGM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BYD
BYD Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYD Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGM vs. BYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MGM Resorts International (MGM) and Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGMBYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.03

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

0.09

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.07

0.20

+1.88

MGM vs. BYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGM Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the BYD Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGM and BYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGM vs. BYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGM drawdown since its inception was -98.11%, roughly equal to the maximum BYD drawdown of -94.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGM and BYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGMBYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.11%

-94.49%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.76%

-12.59%

-10.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.02%

-25.58%

-20.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.33%

-34.58%

-14.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.42%

-80.01%

-0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.70%

-6.79%

-45.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.43%

-50.48%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.79%

5.63%

+5.16%

Volatility

MGM vs. BYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MGM Resorts International (MGM) is 4.57%, while Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) has a volatility of 7.85%. This indicates that MGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGMBYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

7.85%

-3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.87%

20.81%

+10.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.73%

26.27%

+12.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.20%

31.46%

+8.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.75%

43.18%

+2.57%

Dividends

MGM vs. BYD - Dividend Comparison

MGM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BYD
Boyd Gaming Corporation
0.89%0.84%0.94%1.02%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.90%1.11%0.43%
MGM
MGM Resorts International
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.02%0.50%1.56%1.98%1.32%

Financials

MGM vs. BYD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MGM Resorts International and Boyd Gaming Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

MGM vs. BYD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MGM Resorts International and Boyd Gaming Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

MGM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MGM Resorts International reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BYD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported a gross profit of 429.06M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.5%.

MGM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MGM Resorts International reported an operating income of 503.64M and revenue of 4.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

BYD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported an operating income of 200.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.

MGM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MGM Resorts International reported a net income of 292.43M and revenue of 4.45B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.

BYD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boyd Gaming Corporation reported a net income of 131.23M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MGM and BYD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYD has higher volatility (7.85%) compared to MGM (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGM dropped -98.11% vs BYD's -94.49%.

MGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGM and BYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer