PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLT vs. ADSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HLT vs. ADSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) and Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLT achieves a 20.55% return, which is significantly higher than ADSK's -32.97% return. Over the past 10 years, HLT has outperformed ADSK with an annualized return of 48.93%, while ADSK has yielded a comparatively lower 13.54% annualized return.


HLT

1D
1.20%
1M
11.14%
YTD
20.55%
6M
23.56%
1Y
38.36%
3Y*
34.51%
5Y*
22.21%
10Y*
48.93%

ADSK

1D
-3.47%
1M
-14.11%
YTD
-32.97%
6M
-33.33%
1Y
-33.54%
3Y*
-2.38%
5Y*
-6.49%
10Y*
13.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLT vs. ADSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
20.55%16.49%36.11%44.68%-18.72%40.20%0.47%55.48%-9.40%829.98%
ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
-32.97%0.15%21.39%30.29%-33.54%-7.91%66.43%42.65%22.68%41.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HLT and ADSK is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between HLT and ADSK has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HLT:

$80.26B

ADSK:

$42.07B

EPS

HLT:

$6.50

ADSK:

$6.84

PE Ratio

HLT:

53.23

ADSK:

29.03

PEG Ratio

HLT:

0.86

ADSK:

1.12

PS Ratio

HLT:

6.68

ADSK:

5.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

HLT:

$12.28B

ADSK:

$7.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HLT:

$5.44B

ADSK:

$6.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

HLT:

$3.00B

ADSK:

$2.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLT vs. ADSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLT
HLT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

ADSK
ADSK Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ADSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADSK Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
ADSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADSK Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLT vs. ADSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) and Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLTADSKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.83

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

-0.86

+4.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

-1.88

+10.60

HLT vs. ADSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the ADSK Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLT and ADSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLT vs. ADSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLT drawdown since its inception was -50.82%, smaller than the maximum ADSK drawdown of -76.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLT and ADSK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLTADSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.82%

-76.92%

+26.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.29%

-39.28%

+28.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.35%

-39.28%

+12.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.65%

-51.99%

+19.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.82%

-51.99%

+1.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-42.03%

+42.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-22.63%

+12.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

17.87%

-13.45%

Volatility

HLT vs. ADSK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) is 6.84%, while Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) has a volatility of 13.87%. This indicates that HLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLTADSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.84%

13.87%

-7.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.39%

27.98%

-10.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.16%

33.70%

-10.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.06%

35.22%

-8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

180.96%

36.50%

+144.46%

Dividends

HLT vs. ADSK - Dividend Comparison

HLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while ADSK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
0.17%0.21%0.24%0.33%0.36%0.00%0.13%0.54%0.84%31.40%1.03%0.65%

Financials

HLT vs. ADSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Autodesk, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.94B
1.93B
(HLT) Total Revenue
(ADSK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HLT vs. ADSK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Autodesk, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
40.3%
91.0%
Portfolio components
HLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.

ADSK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.76B and revenue of 1.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.0%.

HLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 678.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.

ADSK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported an operating income of 541.00M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.0%.

HLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 385.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.

ADSK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HLT and ADSK have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADSK has higher volatility (13.87%) compared to HLT (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLT dropped -50.82% vs ADSK's -76.92%.

HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLT and ADSK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer