HLRRX vs. FRINX
Compare and contrast key facts about LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX).
HLRRX is managed by REMSGroup. It was launched on Dec 16, 2002. FRINX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 14, 2010.
Performance
HLRRX vs. FRINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLRRX vs. FRINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 5.63% | -9.13% | 9.45% | 10.50% | -21.40% | 40.50% | -3.78% | 31.75% | -13.63% | -1.24% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 0.33% | 6.87% | 7.61% | 9.01% | -14.79% | 18.64% | -1.36% | 17.52% | -1.93% | 6.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLRRX achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly higher than FRINX's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, HLRRX has underperformed FRINX with an annualized return of 4.18%, while FRINX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.05% annualized return.
HLRRX
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.18%
FRINX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLRRX vs. FRINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLRRX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FRINX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLRRX vs. FRINX — Risk / Return Rank
HLRRX
FRINX
HLRRX vs. FRINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLRRX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.03 | 0.91 | -0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.15 | 1.23 | -1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.18 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 1.09 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | 4.54 | -4.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLRRX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | 0.91 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.54 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.53 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.75 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLRRX and FRINX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HLRRX vs. FRINX - Dividend Comparison
HLRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, more than FRINX's 4.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLRRX LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund | 7.60% | 9.39% | 4.93% | 5.50% | 13.71% | 17.02% | 9.10% | 2.44% | 2.68% | 17.61% | 15.94% | 10.13% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 4.38% | 4.40% | 4.41% | 4.78% | 5.80% | 1.31% | 4.53% | 5.45% | 4.89% | 4.21% | 4.77% | 3.53% |
Drawdowns
HLRRX vs. FRINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLRRX drawdown since its inception was -62.78%, which is greater than FRINX's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLRRX and FRINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLRRX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.78% | -34.50% | -28.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.74% | -4.28% | -7.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.99% | -18.30% | -10.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.13% | -34.50% | -13.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.96% | -2.72% | -8.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.52% | -3.41% | -5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 1.03% | +3.31% |
Volatility
HLRRX vs. FRINX - Volatility Comparison
LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Fund (HLRRX) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX) at 1.65%. This indicates that HLRRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLRRX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 1.65% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 2.87% | +6.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.60% | 4.92% | +10.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 6.51% | +11.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 9.50% | +11.31% |