PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLMSX vs. OPGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLMSX vs. OPGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) and Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class A (OPGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLMSX achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly lower than OPGIX's 13.82% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HLMSX having a 5.95% annualized return and OPGIX not far ahead at 6.22%.


HLMSX

1D
-1.08%
1M
1.69%
YTD
5.90%
6M
7.93%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
6.27%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
5.95%

OPGIX

1D
-0.50%
1M
2.45%
YTD
13.82%
6M
11.68%
1Y
18.89%
3Y*
5.15%
5Y*
-5.51%
10Y*
6.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLMSX vs. OPGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLMSX
Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio
5.90%14.87%-6.92%11.78%-24.50%12.82%18.51%29.45%-17.65%34.42%
OPGIX
Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class A
13.82%7.12%-7.47%17.34%-41.63%0.02%39.82%27.74%-18.26%52.59%

Correlation

The correlation between HLMSX and OPGIX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2007

0.75

The correlation between HLMSX and OPGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLMSX vs. OPGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLMSX
HLMSX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
HLMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

OPGIX
OPGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
OPGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
OPGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLMSX vs. OPGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) and Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class A (OPGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLMSXOPGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.24

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

2.19

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

7.94

-6.43

HLMSX vs. OPGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLMSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the OPGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLMSX and OPGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLMSXOPGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

1.32

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

-0.25

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.28

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.49

-0.13

Drawdowns

HLMSX vs. OPGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLMSX drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, roughly equal to the maximum OPGIX drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMSX and OPGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLMSXOPGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-62.57%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-10.08%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-25.17%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.22%

-52.49%

+14.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.22%

-54.65%

+16.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.61%

-32.61%

+23.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.22%

-15.73%

+2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

2.66%

+1.59%

Volatility

HLMSX vs. OPGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) is 3.55%, while Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class A (OPGIX) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that HLMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLMSXOPGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

4.84%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

14.05%

-4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

16.76%

-4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

22.56%

-7.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

22.57%

-7.60%

HLMSX vs. OPGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLMSX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than OPGIX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLMSX vs. OPGIX - Dividend Comparison

HLMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than OPGIX's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLMSX
Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio
3.81%4.04%1.17%1.00%1.83%2.82%0.03%0.52%7.56%1.13%4.37%1.54%
OPGIX
Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class A
0.10%0.11%0.01%0.00%0.00%5.29%8.95%6.16%10.87%2.32%7.86%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLMSX and OPGIX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPGIX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to HLMSX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLMSX dropped -60.77% vs OPGIX's -62.57%.

OPGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLMSX and OPGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer