HLMIX vs. LZIEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX) and Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX).
HLMIX is managed by Harding Loevner. It was launched on May 10, 1994. LZIEX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Oct 29, 1991.
Performance
HLMIX vs. LZIEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLMIX vs. LZIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLMIX Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio | 2.76% | 27.63% | 1.18% | 15.10% | -20.21% | 8.49% | 20.33% | 25.22% | -13.96% | 29.91% |
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio | 0.32% | 34.14% | 5.30% | 16.49% | -15.00% | 6.14% | 8.76% | 21.20% | -13.71% | 22.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLMIX achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than LZIEX's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, HLMIX has outperformed LZIEX with an annualized return of 8.92%, while LZIEX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.30% annualized return.
HLMIX
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 23.54%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.30%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
LZIEX
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLMIX vs. LZIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLMIX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than LZIEX's 0.82% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLMIX vs. LZIEX — Risk / Return Rank
HLMIX
LZIEX
HLMIX vs. LZIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX) and Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLMIX | LZIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | 1.57 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 2.03 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 1.87 | +0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.41 | 7.15 | +1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLMIX | LZIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.57 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.50 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.46 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.37 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLMIX and LZIEX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HLMIX vs. LZIEX - Dividend Comparison
HLMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.54%, more than LZIEX's 12.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLMIX Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio | 14.54% | 14.94% | 7.14% | 3.79% | 2.51% | 2.48% | 0.75% | 1.59% | 1.50% | 1.64% | 0.98% | 1.02% |
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio | 12.31% | 12.35% | 8.26% | 3.78% | 6.12% | 17.81% | 1.03% | 2.07% | 7.93% | 1.42% | 1.06% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
HLMIX vs. LZIEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLMIX drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, roughly equal to the maximum LZIEX drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMIX and LZIEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLMIX | LZIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.03% | -55.35% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.50% | -11.88% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.76% | -30.42% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.76% | -35.12% | +2.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.07% | -9.52% | +1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.76% | -11.27% | -1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 3.11% | -0.36% |
Volatility
HLMIX vs. LZIEX - Volatility Comparison
Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX) and Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) have volatilities of 7.06% and 6.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLMIX | LZIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.06% | 6.75% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.74% | 10.13% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.58% | 15.23% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 15.58% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 16.06% | +0.34% |