HLMEX vs. HLMSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HLMEX (Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio) and HLMSX (Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio) are both mutual funds - HLMEX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Harding Loevner, while HLMSX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Harding Loevner. Over the past 10 years, HLMEX returned 7.06%/yr vs 6.07%/yr for HLMSX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HLMEX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for HLMSX.

Performance

HLMEX vs. HLMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio (HLMEX) and Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLMEX achieves a 22.04% return, which is significantly higher than HLMSX's 7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, HLMEX has outperformed HLMSX with an annualized return of 7.06%, while HLMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.07% annualized return.

HLMEX

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 6.55%
• YTD: 22.04%
• 6M: 23.47%
• 1Y: 45.44%
• 3Y*: 17.89%
• 5Y*: 2.10%
• 10Y*: 7.06%

HLMSX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 7.05%
• 6M: 9.40%
• 1Y: 7.54%
• 3Y*: 6.66%
• 5Y*: 0.39%
• 10Y*: 6.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLMEX vs. HLMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HLMEX Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio	22.04%	28.02%	2.71%	6.16%	-27.66%	-3.41%	13.88%	25.78%	-18.62%	35.33%
HLMSX Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio	7.05%	14.87%	-6.92%	11.78%	-24.50%	12.82%	18.51%	29.45%	-17.65%	34.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HLMEX and HLMSX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2007	0.76

The correlation between HLMEX and HLMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HLMEX vs. HLMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLMEX

HLMEX Risk / Return Rank: 85
HLMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
HLMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
HLMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
HLMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
HLMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

HLMSX

HLMSX Risk / Return Rank: 7
HLMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
HLMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
HLMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
HLMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
HLMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLMEX vs. HLMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio (HLMEX) and Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HLMEX	HLMSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.09	0.58	+2.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.14	0.89	+3.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.11	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.77	0.67	+3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.80	1.66	+13.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HLMEX vs. HLMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLMEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the HLMSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLMEX and HLMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HLMEX	HLMSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.09	0.58	+2.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.03	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.41	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.37	-0.06

Drawdowns

HLMEX vs. HLMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLMEX drawdown since its inception was -65.03%, which is greater than HLMSX's maximum drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMEX and HLMSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HLMEX	HLMSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.03%	-60.77%	-4.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.12%	-10.59%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.59%	-16.57%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.65%	-38.22%	-4.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.82%	-38.22%	-5.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.62%	+8.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.17%	-13.22%	-3.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	4.25%	-1.17%

Volatility

HLMEX vs. HLMSX - Volatility Comparison

Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio (HLMEX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) at 3.33%. This indicates that HLMEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HLMEX	HLMSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.61%	3.33%	+2.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.57%	9.66%	+2.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.80%	12.22%	+2.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.59%	15.04%	+1.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.92%	14.97%	+2.95%

HLMEX vs. HLMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLMEX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HLMSX's 1.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

HLMEX vs. HLMSX - Dividend Comparison

HLMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.26%, more than HLMSX's 3.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HLMEX Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio	78.26%	95.51%	14.22%	1.40%	0.96%	0.71%	0.39%	1.46%	0.98%	0.76%	0.62%	0.63%
HLMSX Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio	3.77%	4.04%	1.17%	1.00%	1.83%	2.82%	0.03%	0.52%	7.56%	1.13%	4.37%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HLMEX and HLMSX in my portfolio?

HLMEX and HLMSX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HLMEX or HLMSX?

HLMEX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to HLMSX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLMEX dropped -65.03% vs HLMSX's -60.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HLMEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.