HLMEX vs. FPADX
Compare and contrast key facts about Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio (HLMEX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX).
HLMEX is managed by Harding Loevner. It was launched on Oct 16, 2005. FPADX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 8, 2011.
Performance
HLMEX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLMEX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLMEX Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio | 1.11% | -34.86% | 2.71% | 6.16% | -27.66% | -3.41% | 13.88% | 25.78% | -18.62% | 35.33% |
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund | 3.44% | 33.90% | 6.80% | 9.51% | -20.06% | -3.07% | 17.84% | 18.28% | -14.65% | 35.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLMEX achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than FPADX's 3.44% return. Over the past 10 years, HLMEX has underperformed FPADX with an annualized return of -1.67%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.85% annualized return.
HLMEX
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -8.47%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- -47.17%
- 1Y
- -35.50%
- 3Y*
- -11.41%
- 5Y*
- -13.37%
- 10Y*
- -1.67%
FPADX
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 32.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLMEX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLMEX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLMEX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank
HLMEX
FPADX
HLMEX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio (HLMEX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLMEX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | 1.88 | -2.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | 2.47 | -2.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.36 | -0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 2.47 | -3.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 9.85 | -11.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLMEX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | 1.88 | -2.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.49 | 0.23 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | 0.45 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.28 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLMEX and FPADX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HLMEX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison
HLMEX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FPADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLMEX Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.22% | 1.40% | 0.96% | 0.71% | 0.39% | 1.46% | 0.98% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.63% |
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund | 2.28% | 2.35% | 2.70% | 2.68% | 2.47% | 2.14% | 1.50% | 2.59% | 2.20% | 0.12% | 1.69% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
HLMEX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLMEX drawdown since its inception was -65.03%, which is greater than FPADX's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMEX and FPADX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLMEX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.03% | -39.16% | -25.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.96% | -13.28% | -37.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.58% | -37.04% | -18.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.41% | -39.16% | -17.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.50% | -10.50% | -44.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.94% | -13.39% | -4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.29% | 3.33% | +21.96% |
Volatility
HLMEX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio (HLMEX) is 7.30%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a volatility of 9.56%. This indicates that HLMEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLMEX | FPADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | 9.56% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.06% | 13.61% | +55.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.92% | 17.83% | +34.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.51% | 16.70% | +10.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 17.63% | +6.08% |