PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLMEX vs. DEMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLMEX vs. DEMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio (HLMEX) and Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLMEX achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly lower than DEMIX's 125.98% return. Over the past 10 years, HLMEX has underperformed DEMIX with an annualized return of 6.85%, while DEMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.71% annualized return.


HLMEX

1D
-3.66%
1M
0.48%
YTD
17.13%
6M
17.57%
1Y
36.23%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
1.28%
10Y*
6.85%

DEMIX

1D
-7.80%
1M
19.01%
YTD
125.98%
6M
138.47%
1Y
226.16%
3Y*
70.15%
5Y*
28.07%
10Y*
22.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLMEX vs. DEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLMEX
Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio
17.13%28.02%2.71%6.16%-27.66%-3.41%13.88%25.78%-18.62%35.33%
DEMIX
Delaware Emerging Markets Fund
125.98%86.79%6.52%17.59%-28.66%-2.08%26.09%24.33%-17.10%41.98%

Correlation

The correlation between HLMEX and DEMIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2005

0.90

The correlation between HLMEX and DEMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLMEX vs. DEMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLMEX
HLMEX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HLMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMIX
DEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLMEX vs. DEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio (HLMEX) and Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLMEXDEMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.74

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

11.72

-8.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

42.60

-30.15

HLMEX vs. DEMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLMEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is lower than the DEMIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLMEX and DEMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLMEX vs. DEMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLMEX drawdown since its inception was -65.03%, roughly equal to the maximum DEMIX drawdown of -63.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMEX and DEMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLMEXDEMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.03%

-63.15%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-21.01%

+8.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.59%

-22.62%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.65%

-42.96%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.82%

-46.29%

+2.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.02%

-7.80%

+3.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.13%

-18.43%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

5.76%

-2.58%

Volatility

HLMEX vs. DEMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio (HLMEX) is 7.83%, while Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX) has a volatility of 27.03%. This indicates that HLMEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLMEXDEMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.83%

27.03%

-19.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.43%

42.15%

-27.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.35%

46.02%

-29.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

27.80%

-10.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

24.46%

-6.50%

HLMEX vs. DEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLMEX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMIX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLMEX vs. DEMIX - Dividend Comparison

HLMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 81.54%, more than DEMIX's 8.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMIX
Delaware Emerging Markets Fund
8.40%18.97%1.99%2.95%1.89%3.42%0.87%0.80%0.65%1.80%0.94%0.30%
HLMEX
Harding Loevner Institutional Emerging Markets Portfolio
81.54%95.51%14.22%1.40%0.96%0.71%0.39%1.46%0.98%0.76%0.62%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLMEX and DEMIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMIX has higher volatility (27.03%) compared to HLMEX (7.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLMEX dropped -65.03% vs DEMIX's -63.15%.

DEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLMEX and DEMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer