PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLLVX vs. VBISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLLVX vs. VBISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund (HLLVX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund (VBISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLLVX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than VBISX's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, HLLVX has outperformed VBISX with an annualized return of 2.29%, while VBISX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.


HLLVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.36%
6M
0.71%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
2.29%

VBISX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.50%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
1.44%
10Y*
1.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLLVX vs. VBISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLLVX
JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund
0.36%5.57%5.15%5.40%-3.71%-0.07%4.51%4.26%1.16%0.85%
VBISX
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund
0.26%5.67%3.66%4.54%-5.61%-1.35%4.63%4.78%1.27%1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between HLLVX and VBISX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 1994

0.77

The correlation between HLLVX and VBISX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLLVX vs. VBISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLLVX
HLLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HLLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HLLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VBISX
VBISX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VBISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBISX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VBISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLLVX vs. VBISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund (HLLVX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund (VBISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLLVXVBISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.33

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

2.37

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

7.61

+3.40

HLLVX vs. VBISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the VBISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLLVX and VBISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLLVXVBISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

1.64

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

0.49

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.38

0.75

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.03

1.34

+0.69

Drawdowns

HLLVX vs. VBISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLLVX drawdown since its inception was -5.77%, smaller than the maximum VBISX drawdown of -8.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLLVX and VBISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLLVXVBISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

-8.79%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.09%

-1.54%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.09%

-1.55%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.77%

-8.72%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.77%

-8.79%

+3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.66%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-0.87%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

0.48%

-0.15%

Volatility

HLLVX vs. VBISX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund (HLLVX) is 0.43%, while Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund (VBISX) has a volatility of 0.69%. This indicates that HLLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLLVXVBISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.43%

0.69%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.99%

1.59%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43%

2.24%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.99%

2.94%

-0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.66%

2.38%

-0.72%

HLLVX vs. VBISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLLVX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than VBISX's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLLVX vs. VBISX - Dividend Comparison

HLLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than VBISX's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLLVX
JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund
3.86%4.21%3.98%2.95%1.45%1.21%2.03%2.40%1.71%1.23%0.95%0.99%
VBISX
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund
3.90%3.44%3.29%2.10%1.38%1.16%1.72%2.16%1.92%1.58%1.42%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLLVX and VBISX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBISX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to HLLVX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLLVX dropped -5.77% vs VBISX's -8.79%.

HLLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLLVX and VBISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer