HLLVX vs. DFEQX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

HLLVX (JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund) and DFEQX (DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, HLLVX returned 2.29%/yr vs 1.93%/yr for DFEQX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HLLVX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DFEQX.

Performance

HLLVX vs. DFEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund (HLLVX) and DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLLVX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than DFEQX's 1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, HLLVX has outperformed DFEQX with an annualized return of 2.29%, while DFEQX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.93% annualized return.

HLLVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 0.71%
• 1Y: 3.62%
• 3Y*: 4.89%
• 5Y*: 2.39%
• 10Y*: 2.29%

DFEQX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.31%
• 6M: 1.63%
• 1Y: 3.70%
• 3Y*: 4.83%
• 5Y*: 2.02%
• 10Y*: 1.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLLVX vs. DFEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HLLVX JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund	0.36%	5.57%	5.15%	5.40%	-3.71%	-0.07%	4.51%	4.26%	1.16%	0.85%
DFEQX DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio	1.31%	4.27%	5.50%	5.44%	-5.18%	-0.60%	2.24%	4.51%	1.34%	1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between HLLVX and DFEQX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012	0.60

The correlation between HLLVX and DFEQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HLLVX vs. DFEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLLVX

HLLVX Risk / Return Rank: 76
HLLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
HLLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
HLLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
HLLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
HLLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

DFEQX

DFEQX Risk / Return Rank: 96
DFEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
DFEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
DFEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
DFEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DFEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLLVX vs. DFEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund (HLLVX) and DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HLLVX	DFEQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	3.53	-0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.21	5.61	-1.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	2.12	-0.53
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	5.09	-1.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.33	21.45	-10.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HLLVX vs. DFEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the DFEQX Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLLVX and DFEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HLLVX	DFEQX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	3.53	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.21	0.98	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.38	1.15	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.03	1.14	+0.89

Drawdowns

HLLVX vs. DFEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLLVX drawdown since its inception was -5.77%, smaller than the maximum DFEQX drawdown of -8.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLLVX and DFEQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HLLVX	DFEQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.77%	-8.40%	+2.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.09%	-0.76%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.09%	-1.16%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.77%	-8.40%	+2.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-5.77%	-8.40%	+2.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-0.10%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.42%	-0.95%	+0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.33%	0.18%	+0.15%

Volatility

HLLVX vs. DFEQX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund (HLLVX) and DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX) have volatilities of 0.44% and 0.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HLLVX	DFEQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	0.45%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.99%	0.88%	+0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43%	1.07%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.99%	2.08%	-0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.66%	1.70%	-0.04%

HLLVX vs. DFEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLLVX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than DFEQX's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

HLLVX vs. DFEQX - Dividend Comparison

HLLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than DFEQX's 4.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFEQX DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio	4.13%	3.62%	4.40%	3.34%	1.78%	1.05%	0.47%	2.18%	3.14%	1.51%	1.59%	1.72%
HLLVX JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund	3.86%	4.21%	3.98%	2.95%	1.45%	1.21%	2.03%	2.40%	1.71%	1.23%	0.95%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HLLVX and DFEQX in my portfolio?

HLLVX and DFEQX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HLLVX or DFEQX?

DFEQX has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to HLLVX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLLVX dropped -5.77% vs DFEQX's -8.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.