HLLVX vs. JLGMX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HLLVX (JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund) and JLGMX (JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6) are both mutual funds - HLLVX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by JPMorgan, while JLGMX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Over the past 10 years, HLLVX returned 2.26%/yr vs 20.56%/yr for JLGMX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. HLLVX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for JLGMX.

Performance

HLLVX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund (HLLVX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLLVX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than JLGMX's 6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, HLLVX has underperformed JLGMX with an annualized return of 2.26%, while JLGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.56% annualized return.

HLLVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 0.52%
• 1Y: 3.14%
• 3Y*: 4.92%
• 5Y*: 2.41%
• 10Y*: 2.26%

JLGMX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 6.63%
• 6M: 4.95%
• 1Y: 19.11%
• 3Y*: 22.47%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 20.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLLVX vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HLLVX JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund	0.36%	5.57%	5.15%	5.40%	-3.71%	-0.07%	4.51%	4.26%	1.16%	0.85%
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6	6.63%	14.38%	35.40%	34.95%	-25.20%	18.48%	56.39%	39.47%	0.74%	38.41%

Correlation

The correlation between HLLVX and JLGMX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2010	-0.05

The correlation between HLLVX and JLGMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HLLVX vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLLVX

HLLVX Risk / Return Rank: 71
HLLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
HLLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
HLLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
HLLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
HLLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

JLGMX

JLGMX Risk / Return Rank: 18
JLGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
JLGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
JLGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
JLGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
JLGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLLVX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund (HLLVX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HLLVX	JLGMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	1.24	+1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	1.74	+1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.23	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	1.24	+1.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.40	3.51	+5.90

HLLVX vs. JLGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the JLGMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLLVX and JLGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HLLVX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLLVX drawdown since its inception was -5.77%, smaller than the maximum JLGMX drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLLVX and JLGMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HLLVX	JLGMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.77%	-31.82%	+26.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.09%	-16.73%	+15.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.09%	-21.47%	+20.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.77%	-31.13%	+25.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-5.77%	-31.82%	+26.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-1.23%	+0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.42%	-5.80%	+5.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	5.90%	-5.56%

Volatility

HLLVX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund (HLLVX) is 0.44%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that HLLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HLLVX	JLGMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	6.59%	-6.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.02%	12.48%	-11.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43%	16.69%	-15.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.00%	20.36%	-18.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.67%	21.66%	-19.99%

HLLVX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLLVX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

HLLVX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison

HLLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than JLGMX's 10.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HLLVX JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund	3.86%	4.21%	3.98%	2.95%	1.45%	1.21%	2.03%	2.40%	1.71%	1.23%	0.95%	0.99%
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6	10.36%	11.04%	2.12%	0.31%	3.49%	14.25%	5.14%	12.65%	15.59%	14.44%	9.71%	4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HLLVX and JLGMX in my portfolio?

HLLVX and JLGMX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HLLVX or JLGMX?

JLGMX has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to HLLVX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLLVX dropped -5.77% vs JLGMX's -31.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HLLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.