HLLVX vs. SEEGX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund (HLLVX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX).
HLLVX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990. SEEGX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on Feb 28, 1992.
Performance
HLLVX vs. SEEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLLVX vs. SEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLLVX JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund | -0.08% | 5.57% | 5.15% | 5.40% | -3.71% | -0.07% | 4.51% | 4.26% | 1.16% | 0.85% |
SEEGX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund | -8.55% | 14.08% | 35.14% | 34.62% | -25.40% | 18.17% | 56.02% | 39.13% | 0.50% | 38.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLLVX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly higher than SEEGX's -8.55% return. Over the past 10 years, HLLVX has underperformed SEEGX with an annualized return of 2.27%, while SEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.94% annualized return.
HLLVX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 3.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
SEEGX
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- -4.89%
- YTD
- -8.55%
- 6M
- -10.48%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 17.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLLVX vs. SEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLLVX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than SEEGX's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLLVX vs. SEEGX — Risk / Return Rank
HLLVX
SEEGX
HLLVX vs. SEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund (HLLVX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLLVX | SEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.50 | 0.62 | +1.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.04 | 1.03 | +3.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.14 | +0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 0.79 | +2.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.31 | 2.40 | +13.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLLVX | SEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 0.62 | +1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.18 | 0.52 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.37 | 0.83 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.03 | 0.55 | +1.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLLVX and SEEGX is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
HLLVX vs. SEEGX - Dividend Comparison
HLLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than SEEGX's 12.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLLVX JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund | 3.88% | 4.21% | 3.98% | 2.95% | 1.45% | 1.21% | 2.03% | 2.40% | 1.71% | 1.23% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
SEEGX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund | 12.51% | 11.44% | 2.00% | 0.12% | 3.42% | 14.92% | 5.27% | 12.85% | 15.97% | 14.79% | 9.88% | 4.49% |
Drawdowns
HLLVX vs. SEEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLLVX drawdown since its inception was -5.77%, smaller than the maximum SEEGX drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLLVX and SEEGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLLVX | SEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -62.09% | +56.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.09% | -16.82% | +15.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.77% | -31.23% | +25.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.77% | -31.85% | +26.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -13.93% | +13.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -16.97% | +16.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | 5.55% | -5.31% |
Volatility
HLLVX vs. SEEGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund (HLLVX) is 0.51%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that HLLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLLVX | SEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | 6.47% | -5.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.95% | 12.54% | -11.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54% | 21.14% | -19.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.98% | 20.26% | -18.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.66% | 21.57% | -19.91% |