HLLVX vs. DLDFX
HLLVX (JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund) and DLDFX (Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, HLLVX returned 2.39%/yr vs 3.83%/yr for DLDFX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HLLVX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for DLDFX.
Performance
HLLVX vs. DLDFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLLVX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than DLDFX's 1.61% return.
HLLVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 3.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 2.39%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
DLDFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- —
HLLVX vs. DLDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLLVX JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund | 0.36% | 5.57% | 5.15% | 5.40% | -3.71% | -0.07% | 4.51% | 1.72% |
DLDFX Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund | 1.61% | 4.91% | 6.09% | 7.11% | -2.59% | 5.41% | 1.52% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLLVX and DLDFX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLLVX vs. DLDFX — Risk / Return Rank
HLLVX
DLDFX
HLLVX vs. DLDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund (HLLVX) and Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund (DLDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLLVX | DLDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.55 | 2.90 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.21 | 5.08 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.86 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 7.67 | -4.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 22.84 | -11.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLLVX | DLDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 2.90 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 2.15 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.03 | 1.73 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
HLLVX vs. DLDFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLLVX drawdown since its inception was -5.77%, smaller than the maximum DLDFX drawdown of -8.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLLVX and DLDFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLLVX | DLDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -8.64% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.09% | -0.64% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.09% | -1.71% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.77% | -3.88% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.16% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -0.71% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.33% | 0.21% | +0.12% |
Volatility
HLLVX vs. DLDFX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund (HLLVX) has a higher volatility of 0.43% compared to Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund (DLDFX) at 0.31%. This indicates that HLLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLLVX | DLDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.43% | 0.31% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.99% | 1.28% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43% | 1.69% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.99% | 1.80% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.66% | 2.07% | -0.41% |
HLLVX vs. DLDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLLVX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than DLDFX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
HLLVX vs. DLDFX - Dividend Comparison
HLLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than DLDFX's 5.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLDFX Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund | 5.33% | 5.29% | 5.64% | 4.77% | 4.54% | 3.74% | 3.86% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HLLVX JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund | 3.86% | 4.21% | 3.98% | 2.95% | 1.45% | 1.21% | 2.03% | 2.40% | 1.71% | 1.23% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HLLVX and DLDFX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLLVX has higher volatility (0.43%) compared to DLDFX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLLVX dropped -5.77% vs DLDFX's -8.64%.
DLDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HLLVX and DLDFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer