CPCC.TO vs. COPP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP).

CPCC.TO and COPP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CPCC.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive North American Listed Copper Producers Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2025. COPP is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Mar 4, 2024. Both CPCC.TO and COPP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CPCC.TO vs. COPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CPCC.TO vs. COPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CPCC.TO Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	0.71%	9.59%
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF	4.00%	13.10%

Different Trading Currencies

CPCC.TO is traded in CAD, while COPP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COPP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPCC.TO achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than COPP's 4.00% return.

CPCC.TO

• 1D: 6.72%
• 1M: -17.90%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COPP

• 1D: 9.08%
• 1M: -17.12%
• YTD: 4.00%
• 6M: 29.34%
• 1Y: 79.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPCC.TO vs. COPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CPCC.TO and COPP have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

CPCC.TO

Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF

COPP

Sprott Copper Miners ETF

Return for Risk

CPCC.TO vs. COPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPP

COPP Risk / Return Rank: 88
COPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
COPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
COPP Omega Ratio Rank: 85
COPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
COPP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPCC.TO vs. COPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPCC.TO	COPP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.98	-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between CPCC.TO and COPP is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CPCC.TO vs. COPP - Dividend Comparison

CPCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than COPP's 2.31% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
CPCC.TO Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	1.94%	0.65%	0.00%
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF	2.31%	2.37%	2.59%

Drawdowns

CPCC.TO vs. COPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, smaller than the maximum COPP drawdown of -41.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPCC.TO and COPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPCC.TO	COPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.12%	-44.37%	+17.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-28.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.06%	-19.51%	+1.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.88%	-14.33%	+8.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CPCC.TO	COPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	33.21%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.22%	43.31%	-0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.22%	38.12%	+5.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.22%	38.12%	+5.10%