HLIF.TO vs. CNQE.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HLIF.TO (Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A) and CNQE.TO (Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Harvest. Both are actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HLIF.TO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CNQE.TO.

Performance

HLIF.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLIF.TO achieves a 16.43% return, which is significantly lower than CNQE.TO's 38.88% return.

HLIF.TO

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 3.87%
• YTD: 16.43%
• 6M: 17.14%
• 1Y: 37.75%
• 3Y*: 20.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNQE.TO

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 38.88%
• 6M: 34.99%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLIF.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HLIF.TO Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A	16.43%	11.58%
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	38.88%	13.80%

Correlation

The correlation between HLIF.TO and CNQE.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025	0.24

Return for Risk

HLIF.TO vs. CNQE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLIF.TO

HLIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 98
HLIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
HLIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
HLIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
HLIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
HLIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLIF.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HLIF.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.52	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	63.13	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HLIF.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.47	2.45	-0.98

Drawdowns

HLIF.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.12%, smaller than the maximum CNQE.TO drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLIF.TO and CNQE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HLIF.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.12%	-18.22%	+7.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.40%	+6.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-4.14%	+2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.60%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HLIF.TO	CNQE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.89%	33.04%	-26.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.48%	33.04%	-22.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.48%	33.04%	-22.56%

HLIF.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLIF.TO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CNQE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

HLIF.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Dividend Comparison

HLIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, less than CNQE.TO's 9.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	9.43%	4.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HLIF.TO Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A	6.02%	6.26%	7.33%	7.96%	3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HLIF.TO and CNQE.TO in my portfolio?

HLIF.TO and CNQE.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HLIF.TO or CNQE.TO?

On fees, CNQE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HLIF.TO or CNQE.TO?

CNQE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HLIF.TO.

What is the main difference between HLIF.TO and CNQE.TO?

Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HLIF.TO and 0.40% for CNQE.TO.