PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLI vs. RTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLI vs. RTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLI achieves a -20.15% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 4.33% return. Over the past 10 years, HLI has outperformed RTH with an annualized return of 21.76%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively lower 14.35% annualized return.


HLI

1D
1.67%
1M
-8.19%
YTD
-20.15%
6M
-22.50%
1Y
-18.32%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
13.63%
10Y*
21.76%

RTH

1D
-0.06%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
4.33%
6M
2.84%
1Y
12.87%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
14.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLI vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLI
Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
-20.15%1.64%47.04%40.67%-13.88%57.04%40.61%36.33%-17.20%49.30%
RTH
VanEck Vectors Retail ETF
4.33%12.36%20.02%20.07%-17.67%24.94%31.62%29.06%3.87%22.45%

Correlation

The correlation between HLI and RTH is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2015

0.44

The correlation between HLI and RTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLI vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLI
HLI Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLI Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
HLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLI Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

RTH
RTH Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
RTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTH Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTH Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLI vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLIRTHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.18

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

1.50

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.12

4.99

-6.11

HLI vs. RTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLI Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the RTH Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLI and RTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLI vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLI drawdown since its inception was -36.57%, smaller than the maximum RTH drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLI and RTH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLIRTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.57%

-42.32%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.38%

-7.83%

-26.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.38%

-13.80%

-20.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.57%

-25.00%

-11.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.57%

-25.00%

-11.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.28%

-3.58%

-29.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-7.34%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.07%

2.35%

+15.72%

Volatility

HLI vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison

Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) has a higher volatility of 8.26% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 3.85%. This indicates that HLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLIRTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.26%

3.85%

+4.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.38%

9.28%

+10.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.11%

12.09%

+14.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.97%

16.81%

+11.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.89%

17.54%

+9.35%

Dividends

HLI vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison

HLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than RTH's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLI
Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
1.81%1.36%1.30%1.82%2.32%1.56%1.90%2.46%2.74%1.76%2.12%0.57%
RTH
VanEck Vectors Retail ETF
0.93%0.97%0.77%1.07%1.16%0.78%0.64%0.91%1.05%1.56%1.84%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLI and RTH have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLI has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to RTH (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLI dropped -36.57% vs RTH's -42.32%.

RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLI and RTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer