HLGAX vs. FGMNX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HLGAX (JPMorgan Government Bond Fund) and FGMNX (Fidelity GNMA Fund) are both Government Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, HLGAX returned 1.12%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for FGMNX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HLGAX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FGMNX.

Performance

HLGAX vs. FGMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Government Bond Fund (HLGAX) and Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLGAX achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than FGMNX's 0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, HLGAX has underperformed FGMNX with an annualized return of 1.12%, while FGMNX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.21% annualized return.

HLGAX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: -0.38%
• 6M: -0.29%
• 1Y: 3.67%
• 3Y*: 3.28%
• 5Y*: -0.25%
• 10Y*: 1.12%

FGMNX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 0.89%
• 6M: 1.18%
• 1Y: 5.84%
• 3Y*: 4.19%
• 5Y*: 0.26%
• 10Y*: 1.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLGAX vs. FGMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HLGAX JPMorgan Government Bond Fund	-0.38%	6.70%	1.26%	4.38%	-11.85%	-2.12%	6.95%	6.58%	0.84%	2.36%
FGMNX Fidelity GNMA Fund	0.89%	7.89%	0.43%	5.46%	-11.52%	-1.03%	3.74%	5.72%	0.62%	1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between HLGAX and FGMNX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 1993	0.81

The correlation between HLGAX and FGMNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.93 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HLGAX vs. FGMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLGAX

HLGAX Risk / Return Rank: 16
HLGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
HLGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
HLGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
HLGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
HLGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FGMNX

FGMNX Risk / Return Rank: 38
FGMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FGMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FGMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FGMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
FGMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLGAX vs. FGMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Government Bond Fund (HLGAX) and Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HLGAX	FGMNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.71	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	2.59	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.31	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	2.56	-1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.02	8.21	-4.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HLGAX vs. FGMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the FGMNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLGAX and FGMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HLGAX	FGMNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	1.71	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05	0.04	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	0.26	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.04	-0.17

Drawdowns

HLGAX vs. FGMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLGAX drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, roughly equal to the maximum FGMNX drawdown of -16.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLGAX and FGMNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HLGAX	FGMNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.41%	-16.84%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.32%	-2.54%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.89%	-7.23%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.46%	-16.54%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.41%	-16.84%	-0.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.83%	-1.28%	-2.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.54%	-1.91%	-0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.08%	0.79%	+0.29%

Volatility

HLGAX vs. FGMNX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Government Bond Fund (HLGAX) and Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) have volatilities of 1.28% and 1.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HLGAX	FGMNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	1.31%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.71%	2.66%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.78%	3.81%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.57%	6.25%	-0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.57%	4.67%	-0.10%

HLGAX vs. FGMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLGAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FGMNX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

HLGAX vs. FGMNX - Dividend Comparison

HLGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than FGMNX's 3.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGMNX Fidelity GNMA Fund	3.62%	3.61%	3.23%	3.45%	1.68%	0.76%	1.61%	2.46%	2.19%	2.17%	2.61%	2.25%
HLGAX JPMorgan Government Bond Fund	3.12%	2.91%	2.86%	2.56%	2.12%	1.49%	1.80%	2.36%	2.45%	2.44%	2.78%	3.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HLGAX and FGMNX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, HLGAX and FGMNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HLGAX or FGMNX?

FGMNX has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to HLGAX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLGAX dropped -17.41% vs FGMNX's -16.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.