HLF vs. INBX
HLF (Herbalife Nutrition Ltd.) and INBX (Inhibrx, Inc.) are both stocks. HLF operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while INBX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past year, HLF returned 50.87% vs 524.92% for INBX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HLF vs. INBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLF achieves a -5.90% return, which is significantly lower than INBX's 18.10% return.
HLF
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- -5.90%
- 6M
- -11.14%
- 1Y
- 50.87%
- 3Y*
- -1.34%
- 5Y*
- -25.37%
- 10Y*
- -8.27%
INBX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -7.92%
- YTD
- 18.10%
- 6M
- 6.60%
- 1Y
- 524.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HLF vs. INBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HLF Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. | -5.90% | 92.68% | -38.17% |
INBX Inhibrx, Inc. | 18.10% | 412.99% | 18.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLF and INBX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2024 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
HLF:
$1.31B
INBX:
$1.45B
HLF:
$2.29
INBX:
-$8.40
HLF:
0.25
INBX:
1.11K
HLF:
$5.13B
INBX:
$1.30M
HLF:
$3.93B
INBX:
-$508.00K
HLF:
$423.60M
INBX:
-$117.63M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLF vs. INBX — Risk / Return Rank
HLF
INBX
HLF vs. INBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF) and Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HLF | INBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.67 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 13.70 | -12.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | 32.18 | -29.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HLF vs. INBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLF drawdown since its inception was -91.69%, which is greater than INBX's maximum drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLF and INBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLF | INBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.69% | -39.84% | -51.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.39% | -38.66% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.27% | -34.22% | -46.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -17.24% | -14.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.47% | 16.42% | +3.05% |
Volatility
HLF vs. INBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF) is 12.09%, while Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX) has a volatility of 15.84%. This indicates that HLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLF | INBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.09% | 15.84% | -3.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.05% | 61.05% | -22.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.04% | 129.43% | -68.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.89% | 99.84% | -38.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.94% | 99.84% | -49.90% |
Dividends
HLF vs. INBX - Dividend Comparison
Neither HLF nor INBX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
HLF vs. INBX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. and Inhibrx, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HLF and INBX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INBX has higher volatility (15.84%) compared to HLF (12.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLF dropped -91.69% vs INBX's -39.84%.
INBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.10 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HLF and INBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer