HJPSX vs. RMBPX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX) and RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX).

HJPSX is managed by Hennessy. It was launched on Aug 30, 2007. RMBPX is managed by RMB Funds. It was launched on Dec 26, 2017.

Performance

HJPSX vs. RMBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX) and RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HJPSX vs. RMBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HJPSX Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund	3.90%	29.02%	8.24%	16.30%	-16.35%	-4.64%	13.43%	19.97%	-15.69%
RMBPX RMB Japan Fund	0.00%	-0.24%	-14.03%	19.33%	-14.50%	-2.65%	13.06%	17.64%	-17.62%

Returns By Period

HJPSX

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: -10.41%
• YTD: 3.90%
• 6M: 5.52%
• 1Y: 31.52%
• 3Y*: 15.99%
• 5Y*: 5.88%
• 10Y*: 10.24%

RMBPX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HJPSX vs. RMBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HJPSX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than RMBPX's 1.30% expense ratio.

HJPSX

Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund

RMBPX

RMB Japan Fund

Return for Risk

HJPSX vs. RMBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HJPSX

HJPSX Risk / Return Rank: 79
HJPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
HJPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
HJPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
HJPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
HJPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HJPSX vs. RMBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX) and RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HJPSX	RMBPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.34	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HJPSX	RMBPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between HJPSX and RMBPX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HJPSX vs. RMBPX - Dividend Comparison

HJPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.75%, while RMBPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HJPSX Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund	12.75%	13.25%	3.64%	0.85%	0.61%	0.43%	0.23%	1.30%	3.46%	2.09%	2.03%	3.34%
RMBPX RMB Japan Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.28%	4.43%	1.04%	8.11%	0.29%	1.15%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HJPSX	RMBPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.12%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.10%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HJPSX	RMBPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.83%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.58%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.23%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.12%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.66%	—	—