PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HJPNX vs. HFCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HJPNX vs. HFCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Japan Fund (HJPNX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HJPNX achieves a 20.44% return, which is significantly higher than HFCGX's 16.49% return. Over the past 10 years, HJPNX has underperformed HFCGX with an annualized return of 9.80%, while HFCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.


HJPNX

1D
1.19%
1M
9.97%
YTD
20.44%
6M
20.50%
1Y
31.96%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
9.80%

HFCGX

1D
-0.05%
1M
5.14%
YTD
16.49%
6M
17.87%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
25.16%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HJPNX vs. HFCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HJPNX
Hennessy Japan Fund
20.44%14.58%18.72%22.90%-30.65%-3.08%25.52%18.04%-6.57%32.04%
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
16.49%4.78%31.45%19.58%-4.97%29.94%17.73%20.70%-21.39%16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HJPNX and HFCGX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2003

0.46

The correlation between HJPNX and HFCGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.52 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HJPNX vs. HFCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HJPNX
HJPNX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
HJPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HJPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
HJPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
HJPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
HJPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCGX
HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HJPNX vs. HFCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Japan Fund (HJPNX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HJPNXHFCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

3.00

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

9.88

-2.08

HJPNX vs. HFCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HJPNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the HFCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HJPNX and HFCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HJPNXHFCGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.81

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.56

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.50

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.39

+0.06

Drawdowns

HJPNX vs. HFCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HJPNX drawdown since its inception was -59.65%, roughly equal to the maximum HFCGX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HJPNX and HFCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HJPNXHFCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.65%

-62.35%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.18%

-7.82%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.06%

-22.86%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.72%

-26.30%

-18.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.72%

-54.22%

+9.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.05%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.57%

-15.23%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

2.37%

+1.84%

Volatility

HJPNX vs. HFCGX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Japan Fund (HJPNX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HJPNXHFCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

4.46%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.68%

9.45%

+7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.64%

12.93%

+9.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.00%

24.06%

-3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.80%

25.81%

-7.01%

HJPNX vs. HFCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HJPNX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than HFCGX's 1.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

HJPNX vs. HFCGX - Dividend Comparison

HJPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.65%, while HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.11%0.38%3.58%26.58%0.00%0.00%10.47%0.00%0.00%0.11%
HJPNX
Hennessy Japan Fund
10.65%12.83%5.80%5.87%0.00%0.89%0.00%0.13%0.04%0.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HJPNX and HFCGX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFCGX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to HJPNX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HJPNX dropped -59.65% vs HFCGX's -62.35%.

HFCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HJPNX and HFCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer