HJPNX vs. MINDX
HJPNX (Hennessy Japan Fund) and MINDX (Matthews India Fund) are both mutual funds - HJPNX is a Japan Equities fund managed by Hennessy, while MINDX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Matthews. Over the past 10 years, HJPNX returned 10.15%/yr vs 6.02%/yr for MINDX. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HJPNX charges 1.44%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for MINDX.
Performance
HJPNX vs. MINDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HJPNX achieves a 23.56% return, which is significantly higher than MINDX's -8.93% return. Over the past 10 years, HJPNX has outperformed MINDX with an annualized return of 10.15%, while MINDX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.02% annualized return.
HJPNX
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 23.56%
- 6M
- 24.15%
- 1Y
- 40.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
MINDX
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 6M
- -9.72%
- 1Y
- -5.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- 6.02%
HJPNX vs. MINDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HJPNX Hennessy Japan Fund | 23.56% | 14.58% | 18.72% | 22.90% | -30.65% | -3.08% | 25.52% | 18.04% | -6.57% | 32.04% |
MINDX Matthews India Fund | -8.93% | 1.61% | 9.99% | 23.14% | -9.87% | 17.87% | 16.46% | -0.79% | -9.80% | 33.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between HJPNX and MINDX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2005 | 0.37 |
The correlation between HJPNX and MINDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HJPNX vs. MINDX — Risk / Return Rank
HJPNX
MINDX
HJPNX vs. MINDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Japan Fund (HJPNX) and Matthews India Fund (MINDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HJPNX | MINDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.95 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | -0.25 | +2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | -0.60 | +9.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HJPNX vs. MINDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HJPNX drawdown since its inception was -59.65%, smaller than the maximum MINDX drawdown of -72.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HJPNX and MINDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HJPNX | MINDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.65% | -72.18% | +12.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.18% | -21.96% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.06% | -26.51% | +6.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.72% | -26.51% | -18.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.72% | -48.46% | +3.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -16.83% | +16.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.54% | -14.95% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 9.12% | -4.92% |
Volatility
HJPNX vs. MINDX - Volatility Comparison
Hennessy Japan Fund (HJPNX) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Matthews India Fund (MINDX) at 4.65%. This indicates that HJPNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HJPNX | MINDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 4.65% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.29% | 13.53% | +3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.11% | 15.93% | +7.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 15.98% | +5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 17.47% | +1.40% |
HJPNX vs. MINDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HJPNX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than MINDX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HJPNX vs. MINDX - Dividend Comparison
HJPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.38%, more than MINDX's 7.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HJPNX Hennessy Japan Fund | 10.38% | 12.83% | 5.80% | 5.87% | 0.00% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINDX Matthews India Fund | 7.42% | 6.76% | 15.03% | 3.07% | 15.30% | 9.87% | 3.03% | 12.04% | 16.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HJPNX and MINDX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HJPNX has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to MINDX (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HJPNX dropped -59.65% vs MINDX's -72.18%.
HJPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HJPNX and MINDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer