CIGIX vs. FIVQX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CIGIX (Calamos International Growth Fund) and FIVQX (Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CIGIX returned 8.71%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for FIVQX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CIGIX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for FIVQX.

Performance

CIGIX vs. FIVQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) and Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I (FIVQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIGIX achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than FIVQX's 11.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CIGIX has underperformed FIVQX with an annualized return of 8.71%, while FIVQX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.89% annualized return.

CIGIX

• 1D: 3.36%
• 1M: -8.13%
• 6M: 4.57%
• YTD: 16.59%
• 1Y: 26.07%
• 3Y*: 18.47%
• 5Y*: 1.91%
• 10Y*: 8.71%
• ALL TIME*: 7.31%

FIVQX

• 1D: 2.28%
• 1M: 2.48%
• 6M: 5.93%
• YTD: 11.25%
• 1Y: 27.48%
• 3Y*: 20.75%
• 5Y*: 13.79%
• 10Y*: 9.89%
• ALL TIME*: 5.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FIVQX Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CIGIX vs. FIVQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund	16.59%	23.11%	12.51%	15.33%	-30.54%	-8.98%	44.95%	29.69%	-20.93%	39.54%
FIVQX Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I	11.25%	43.57%	4.85%	19.10%	-7.95%	14.94%	3.26%	18.95%	-17.20%	17.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CIGIX and FIVQX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2006	0.87

The correlation between CIGIX and FIVQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CIGIX vs. FIVQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CIGIX

CIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 29
CIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
CIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

FIVQX

FIVQX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FIVQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FIVQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FIVQX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FIVQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FIVQX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CIGIX vs. FIVQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) and Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I (FIVQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CIGIX	FIVQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	1.75	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	2.49	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.31	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	2.54	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.24	9.29	-5.05

CIGIX vs. FIVQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the FIVQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIGIX and FIVQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CIGIX vs. FIVQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIGIX drawdown since its inception was -64.46%, roughly equal to the maximum FIVQX drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIGIX and FIVQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIGIX	FIVQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.46%	-64.41%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.45%	-10.37%	-8.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.38%	-14.47%	-4.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.15%	-27.53%	-22.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.15%	-43.46%	-6.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.71%	0.00%	-15.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.24%	-16.13%	+0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.79%	2.82%	+2.97%

Volatility

CIGIX vs. FIVQX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I (FIVQX) at 4.35%. This indicates that CIGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIVQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIGIX	FIVQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.03%	4.35%	+4.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.74%	12.68%	+12.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.37%	15.04%	+12.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.10%	16.58%	+5.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.40%	17.62%	+2.78%

CIGIX vs. FIVQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIGIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FIVQX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIGIX vs. FIVQX - Dividend Comparison

CIGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.57%, more than FIVQX's 2.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund	11.57%	13.49%	4.54%	0.28%	0.00%	0.33%	5.42%	0.00%	13.25%	3.76%	0.00%	0.13%
FIVQX Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I	2.14%	2.38%	2.34%	2.05%	1.87%	4.29%	1.76%	3.46%	3.26%	0.15%	2.61%	1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIGIX and FIVQX in my portfolio?

CIGIX and FIVQX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CIGIX or FIVQX?

CIGIX has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to FIVQX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIGIX dropped -64.46% vs FIVQX's -64.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIVQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.