HIWS.L vs. IQCY.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HIWS.L (HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc) and IQCY.L (Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) are both Global Equities funds - HIWS.L tracks the MSCI World Islamic Universal Screened Select Index while IQCY.L tracks the MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HIWS.L returned 17.16%/yr vs 92.20%/yr for IQCY.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HIWS.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IQCY.L.

Performance

HIWS.L vs. IQCY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) and Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIWS.L achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly lower than IQCY.L's 30.19% return.

HIWS.L

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 8.81%
• YTD: 21.23%
• 6M: 20.63%
• 1Y: 40.74%
• 3Y*: 17.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IQCY.L

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: 9.91%
• YTD: 30.19%
• 6M: 27.14%
• 1Y: 49.61%
• 3Y*: 92.20%
• 5Y*: 48.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIWS.L vs. IQCY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HIWS.L HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc	21.23%	13.05%	8.10%	19.20%	-3.08%
IQCY.L Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	30.19%	14.12%	342.87%	17.77%	-4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HIWS.L and IQCY.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022	0.83

The correlation between HIWS.L and IQCY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HIWS.L vs. IQCY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIWS.L

HIWS.L Risk / Return Rank: 90
HIWS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
HIWS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
HIWS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
HIWS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
HIWS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

IQCY.L

IQCY.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
IQCY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
IQCY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
IQCY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
IQCY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IQCY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIWS.L vs. IQCY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) and Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIWS.L	IQCY.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.09	3.10	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.19	4.28	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.54	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.52	5.29	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.89	15.92	+3.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIWS.L vs. IQCY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIWS.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is comparable to the IQCY.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIWS.L and IQCY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIWS.L	IQCY.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.09	3.10	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	0.39	+0.82

Drawdowns

HIWS.L vs. IQCY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIWS.L drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, smaller than the maximum IQCY.L drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIWS.L and IQCY.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIWS.L	IQCY.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.14%	-22.65%	+1.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.33%	-9.40%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.14%	-21.98%	+0.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-1.35%	+1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.78%	-6.23%	+3.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	3.13%	-1.09%

Volatility

HIWS.L vs. IQCY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) is 4.48%, while Lyxor MSCI Smart Cities ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (IQCY.L) has a volatility of 6.49%. This indicates that HIWS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQCY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIWS.L	IQCY.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.48%	6.49%	-2.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.08%	12.58%	-2.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.06%	16.06%	-3.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.72%	131.45%	-117.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.72%	119.50%	-105.78%

HIWS.L vs. IQCY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIWS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IQCY.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIWS.L vs. IQCY.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HIWS.L nor IQCY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIWS.L and IQCY.L in my portfolio?

HIWS.L and IQCY.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HIWS.L or IQCY.L?

On fees, HIWS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIWS.L or IQCY.L?

HIWS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IQCY.L.

What is the main difference between HIWS.L and IQCY.L?

HIWS.L tracks MSCI World Islamic Universal Screened Select Index, while IQCY.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HIWS.L and 0.45% for IQCY.L.