HISF vs. INCM
HISF (First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF) and INCM (Franklin Income Focus ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HISF returned 5.74% vs 15.73% for INCM. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HISF charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for INCM.
Performance
HISF vs. INCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HISF achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than INCM's 6.45% return.
HISF
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 5.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INCM
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 6.84%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HISF vs. INCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HISF First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF | 0.03% | 8.39% | 3.30% |
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 6.45% | 13.07% | 6.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between HISF and INCM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024 | 0.55 |
The correlation between HISF and INCM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HISF vs. INCM — Risk / Return Rank
HISF
INCM
HISF vs. INCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HISF | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 3.01 | -1.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.55 | 4.49 | -1.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.57 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 4.95 | -2.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | 20.86 | -13.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HISF | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 3.01 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 1.51 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
HISF vs. INCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HISF drawdown since its inception was -3.86%, smaller than the maximum INCM drawdown of -7.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HISF and INCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HISF | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -7.84% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.90% | -3.19% | +0.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -0.75% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -1.09% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 0.76% | +0.04% |
Volatility
HISF vs. INCM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF) is 1.21%, while Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that HISF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HISF | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | 1.66% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.61% | 3.82% | -1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32% | 5.25% | -1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 7.23% | -3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 7.23% | -3.28% |
HISF vs. INCM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HISF has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than INCM's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
HISF vs. INCM - Dividend Comparison
HISF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than INCM's 5.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HISF First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF | 5.00% | 4.69% | 3.92% | 0.00% |
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 5.08% | 4.96% | 5.06% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HISF and INCM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INCM has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to HISF (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HISF dropped -3.86% vs INCM's -7.84%.
On 1-year performance, INCM leads with 15.73% vs 5.74% for HISF. On fees, INCM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, HISF has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INCM has performed better with a 15.73% return vs 5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INCM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for HISF.
INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 5.00% for HISF.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for HISF and 0.38% for INCM.
INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HISF and INCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer