HISCX vs. UMBHX
HISCX (Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HISCX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
HISCX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HISCX
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 20.18%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 38.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
UMBHX
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HISCX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HISCX Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS Fund | 0.37% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between HISCX and UMBHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HISCX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
HISCX
UMBHX
HISCX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS Fund (HISCX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HISCX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.96 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HISCX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.79 | -1.48 |
Drawdowns
HISCX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HISCX drawdown since its inception was -82.02%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HISCX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HISCX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.02% | -1.86% | -80.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.25% | -0.84% | -31.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | — | — |
Volatility
HISCX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HISCX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.73% | 30.30% | -9.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 30.30% | -6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.87% | 30.30% | -6.43% |
HISCX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HISCX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
HISCX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
HISCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.12%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HISCX Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS Fund | 20.12% | 24.18% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 22.03% | 8.72% | 2.93% | 19.12% | 7.80% | 0.04% | 4.39% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, HISCX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for HISCX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer