PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HISCX vs. FECGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HISCX vs. FECGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS Fund (HISCX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HISCX achieves a 20.18% return, which is significantly higher than FECGX's 18.46% return.


HISCX

1D
1.13%
1M
5.58%
YTD
20.18%
6M
18.11%
1Y
38.50%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
10.52%

FECGX

1D
0.87%
1M
5.85%
YTD
18.46%
6M
16.79%
1Y
39.39%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HISCX vs. FECGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HISCX
Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS Fund
20.18%6.50%13.13%18.42%-29.00%4.25%33.20%10.30%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
18.46%13.04%15.26%18.90%-26.17%2.83%34.41%7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between HISCX and FECGX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019

0.98

The correlation between HISCX and FECGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HISCX vs. FECGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HISCX
HISCX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
HISCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HISCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
HISCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HISCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HISCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FECGX
FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HISCX vs. FECGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS Fund (HISCX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HISCXFECGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

1.96

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.72

2.68

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.83

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.96

10.20

+1.77

HISCX vs. FECGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HISCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the FECGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HISCX and FECGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HISCXFECGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

1.96

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.25

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.39

-0.09

Drawdowns

HISCX vs. FECGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HISCX drawdown since its inception was -82.02%, which is greater than FECGX's maximum drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HISCX and FECGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HISCXFECGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.02%

-41.85%

-40.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.26%

-14.81%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.31%

-28.45%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.40%

-40.34%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.25%

-15.76%

-16.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

4.10%

-0.69%

Volatility

HISCX vs. FECGX - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS Fund (HISCX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) have volatilities of 6.23% and 6.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HISCXFECGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

6.44%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.80%

15.86%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.73%

21.35%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.73%

24.54%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.87%

27.19%

-3.32%

HISCX vs. FECGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HISCX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FECGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

HISCX vs. FECGX - Dividend Comparison

HISCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.12%, more than FECGX's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.46%0.54%1.25%0.81%0.80%3.43%1.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HISCX
Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS Fund
20.12%24.18%0.29%0.00%22.03%8.72%2.93%19.12%7.80%0.04%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, HISCX and FECGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FECGX has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to HISCX (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HISCX dropped -82.02% vs FECGX's -41.85%.

HISCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HISCX and FECGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer