HIPS vs. TSDD
HIPS (GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HIPS is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the TFMS HIPS Index, while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. HIPS is passively managed, while TSDD is actively managed. Over the past year, HIPS returned 5.37% vs -63.73% for TSDD. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. HIPS charges 3.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSDD.
Performance
HIPS vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIPS achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly higher than TSDD's -1.03% return.
HIPS
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 1Y
- 5.37%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- 5.24%
TSDD
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- 6M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- -63.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIPS vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HIPS GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF | 5.64% | 1.00% | 13.71% | 9.11% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -1.03% | -74.84% | -89.21% | -20.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIPS and TSDD is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIPS vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
HIPS
TSDD
HIPS vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIPS | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.90 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | -0.92 | +1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | -1.16 | +3.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIPS vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIPS drawdown since its inception was -53.14%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIPS and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIPS | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.14% | -99.03% | +45.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -69.48% | +63.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -98.87% | +96.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -72.18% | +64.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 54.92% | -52.25% |
Volatility
HIPS vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) is 2.66%, while GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a volatility of 34.25%. This indicates that HIPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIPS | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 34.25% | -31.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.34% | 62.89% | -55.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.71% | 89.43% | -79.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 114.51% | -101.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 114.51% | -96.54% |
HIPS vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIPS has a 3.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TSDD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIPS vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
HIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, more than TSDD's 8.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIPS GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF | 11.04% | 11.04% | 10.04% | 10.32% | 10.76% | 8.43% | 9.50% | 6.93% | 8.66% | 7.28% | 7.20% | 8.17% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.51% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIPS and TSDD have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (34.25%) compared to HIPS (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIPS dropped -53.14% vs TSDD's -99.03%.
On 1-year performance, HIPS leads with 5.37% vs -63.73% for TSDD. On fees, TSDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, HIPS has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HIPS has performed better with a 5.37% return vs -63.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.19% for HIPS.
HIPS has the higher dividend yield at 11.04%, compared with 8.51% for TSDD.
HIPS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while TSDD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 3.19% for HIPS and 0.95% for TSDD.
HIPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIPS and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer