HIMZ vs. DIG
HIMZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF) and DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) are both Leveraged Equities funds. HIMZ is actively managed, while DIG is passively managed. Over the past year, HIMZ returned -79.25% vs 53.89% for DIG. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIMZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DIG.
Performance
HIMZ vs. DIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIMZ achieves a -44.56% return, which is significantly lower than DIG's 44.39% return.
HIMZ
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 78.12%
- YTD
- -44.56%
- 6M
- -52.24%
- 1Y
- -79.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIG
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -15.65%
- YTD
- 44.39%
- 6M
- 45.60%
- 1Y
- 53.89%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 24.80%
- 10Y*
- 3.76%
HIMZ vs. DIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF | -44.56% | -69.65% |
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 44.39% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIMZ and DIG is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025 | 0.04 |
The correlation between HIMZ and DIG shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HIMZ vs. DIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HIMZ
DIG
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
HIMZ
DIG
-
Basic Materials
HIMZ
-
DIG
-
Communication Services
HIMZ
-
DIG
-
Consumer Cyclical
HIMZ
-
DIG
-
Energy
HIMZ
-
DIG
Financial Services
HIMZ
-
DIG
Healthcare
HIMZ
-
DIG
-
Industrials
HIMZ
-
DIG
-
Real Estate
HIMZ
-
DIG
-
Technology
HIMZ
-
DIG
-
Utilities
HIMZ
-
DIG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIMZ vs. DIG — Risk / Return Rank
HIMZ
DIG
HIMZ vs. DIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIMZ | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.22 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 1.92 | -2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 5.59 | -6.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIMZ vs. DIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIMZ drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, roughly equal to the maximum DIG drawdown of -97.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMZ and DIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIMZ | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.18% | -97.04% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.18% | -28.23% | -68.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.98% | -57.70% | -36.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.79% | -64.33% | -5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 74.50% | 9.68% | +64.82% |
Volatility
HIMZ vs. DIG - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) has a higher volatility of 46.42% compared to ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) at 14.13%. This indicates that HIMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIMZ | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.42% | 14.13% | +32.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 136.27% | 33.67% | +102.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 195.06% | 41.74% | +153.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.31% | 51.53% | +148.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.31% | 57.83% | +142.48% |
HIMZ vs. DIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIMZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than DIG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIMZ vs. DIG - Dividend Comparison
HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than DIG's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.72% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF | 4.41% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIMZ and DIG have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIMZ has higher volatility (46.42%) compared to DIG (14.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMZ dropped -98.18% vs DIG's -97.04%.
On 1-year performance, DIG leads with 53.89% vs -79.25% for HIMZ. On fees, DIG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DIG has been the lower-risk option at 14.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DIG has performed better with a 53.89% return vs -79.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HIMZ.
HIMZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 1.72% for DIG.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HIMZ and 0.95% for DIG.
DIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIMZ and DIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer