PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMY vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HIMY vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Leveraged Long + Income HIMS ETF (HIMY) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HIMY vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMY achieves a -13.23% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 18.59% return.


HIMY

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-13.23%
6M
-70.17%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MULL

1D
9.98%
1M
-37.16%
YTD
18.59%
6M
194.62%
1Y
734.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HIMY vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMY has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HIMY vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMY

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMY vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Leveraged Long + Income HIMS ETF (HIMY) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HIMY vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIMYMULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.71

1.62

-2.33

Correlation

The correlation between HIMY and MULL is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HIMY vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

HIMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.38%, more than MULL's 0.33% yield.


Drawdowns

HIMY vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMY drawdown since its inception was -76.38%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMY and MULL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMYMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.38%

-72.29%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.01%

-48.41%

-25.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.33%

-21.94%

-25.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.76%

Volatility

HIMY vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HIMYMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

47.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

98.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

106.47%

129.87%

-23.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

106.47%

129.40%

-22.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

106.47%

129.40%

-22.93%