PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMU vs. NHYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIMU vs. NHYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMU achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly lower than NHYM's 2.83% return.


HIMU

1D
0.00%
1M
1.18%
YTD
2.68%
6M
2.79%
1Y
7.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NHYM

1D
0.28%
1M
1.10%
YTD
2.83%
6M
3.37%
1Y
8.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMU vs. NHYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HIMU and NHYM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025

0.61

The correlation between HIMU and NHYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIMU vs. NHYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMU
HIMU Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HIMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMU Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMU Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

NHYM
NHYM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NHYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NHYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHYM Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMU vs. NHYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIMUNHYMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

2.02

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.30

3.13

-0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

3.18

-0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.08

9.32

-2.24

HIMU vs. NHYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMU Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the NHYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMU and NHYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIMUNHYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.02

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.77

-0.37

Drawdowns

HIMU vs. NHYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMU drawdown since its inception was -8.01%, which is greater than NHYM's maximum drawdown of -6.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMU and NHYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMUNHYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-6.11%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-2.77%

-0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-1.74%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.95%

+0.10%

Volatility

HIMU vs. NHYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) is 1.26%, while Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) has a volatility of 1.34%. This indicates that HIMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NHYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIMUNHYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

1.34%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

2.65%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.62%

4.39%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.42%

5.94%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.42%

5.94%

+1.48%

HIMU vs. NHYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMU has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than NHYM's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIMU vs. NHYM - Dividend Comparison

HIMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than NHYM's 4.53% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HIMU and NHYM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NHYM has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to HIMU (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMU dropped -8.01% vs NHYM's -6.11%.

On 1-year performance, NHYM leads with 8.84% vs 7.39% for HIMU. On fees, NHYM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NHYM has performed better with a 8.84% return vs 7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NHYM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for HIMU.

HIMU has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 4.53% for NHYM.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for HIMU and 0.35% for NHYM.

NHYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIMU and NHYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer