HIMU vs. IBIT
HIMU (iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HIMU is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by iShares, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. HIMU is actively managed, while IBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, HIMU returned 7.07% vs -35.90% for IBIT. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. HIMU charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
HIMU vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIMU achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -23.36% return.
HIMU
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 7.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -6.03%
- 1M
- -14.44%
- YTD
- -23.36%
- 6M
- -26.36%
- 1Y
- -35.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIMU vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HIMU iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF | 2.68% | 1.14% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -23.36% | -10.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIMU and IBIT is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIMU vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
HIMU
IBIT
HIMU vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIMU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | -0.83 | +2.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.20 | -1.09 | +3.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.88 | +0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | -0.73 | +2.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | -1.27 | +8.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIMU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | -0.83 | +2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.32 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
HIMU vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIMU drawdown since its inception was -8.01%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMU and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIMU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -49.36% | +41.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.29% | -49.36% | +46.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -46.63% | +46.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -15.96% | +14.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 28.28% | -27.23% |
Volatility
HIMU vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) is 1.27%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that HIMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIMU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 9.76% | -8.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.16% | 34.85% | -31.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62% | 43.65% | -39.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 50.20% | -42.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 50.20% | -42.76% |
HIMU vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIMU has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIMU vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
HIMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HIMU iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF | 5.15% | 4.57% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIMU and IBIT have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to HIMU (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMU dropped -8.01% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, HIMU leads with 7.07% vs -35.90% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HIMU has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HIMU has performed better with a 7.07% return vs -35.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for HIMU.
HIMU has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
HIMU is categorized as High Yield Muni, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for HIMU and 0.25% for IBIT.
HIMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIMU and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer