PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIMS vs. PG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HIMS vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMS achieves a -17.40% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 5.93% return.


HIMS

1D
-7.10%
1M
10.64%
YTD
-17.40%
6M
-27.92%
1Y
-51.66%
3Y*
43.69%
5Y*
17.04%
10Y*

PG

1D
0.86%
1M
4.83%
YTD
5.93%
6M
6.28%
1Y
-3.97%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMS vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
-17.40%34.28%171.69%38.85%-2.14%-55.14%47.47%1.23%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
5.93%-12.26%17.25%-0.86%-5.05%20.52%14.15%2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMS and PG is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

-0.02

The correlation between HIMS and PG shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HIMS:

$6.12B

PG:

$361.53B

EPS

HIMS:

-$0.05

PG:

$5.23

PS Ratio

HIMS:

2.78

PG:

4.20

PB Ratio

HIMS:

13.73

PG:

6.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

HIMS:

$2.37B

PG:

$86.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HIMS:

$1.70B

PG:

$43.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

HIMS:

$16.04M

PG:

$22.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIMS vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMS
HIMS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
HIMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMS Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMS vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIMSPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.97

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

-0.37

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

-0.68

-0.42

HIMS vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMS Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMS and PG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIMS vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMS drawdown since its inception was -87.29%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMS and PG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIMSPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.29%

-54.25%

-33.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.06%

-15.52%

-62.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.88%

-21.15%

-57.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.88%

-23.77%

-55.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.98%

-13.29%

-47.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.23%

-12.16%

-31.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.06%

8.80%

+39.26%

Volatility

HIMS vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) has a higher volatility of 21.36% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.99%. This indicates that HIMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIMSPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.36%

6.99%

+14.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.20%

15.01%

+52.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.46%

18.78%

+77.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.26%

17.82%

+65.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.20%

19.05%

+58.15%

Dividends

HIMS vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

HIMS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.85%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%

Financials

HIMS vs. PG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hims & Hers Health, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
608.10M
21.24B
(HIMS) Total Revenue
(PG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HIMS vs. PG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hims & Hers Health, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
65.3%
49.5%
Portfolio components
HIMS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hims & Hers Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 396.79M and revenue of 608.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.3%.

PG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

HIMS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hims & Hers Health, Inc. reported an operating income of -78.32M and revenue of 608.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.

PG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

HIMS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hims & Hers Health, Inc. reported a net income of -92.12M and revenue of 608.10M, resulting in a net margin of -15.2%.

PG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HIMS and PG have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIMS has higher volatility (21.36%) compared to PG (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMS dropped -87.29% vs PG's -54.25%.

PG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.30 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIMS and PG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer