HIMS vs. GDXU
HIMS (Hims & Hers Health, Inc.) is a stock, while GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. Over the past 5 years, HIMS returned 17.04%/yr vs -14.73%/yr for GDXU. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HIMS vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIMS achieves a -17.40% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -56.00% return.
HIMS
- 1D
- -7.10%
- 1M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- -17.40%
- 6M
- -27.92%
- 1Y
- -53.07%
- 3Y*
- 43.69%
- 5Y*
- 17.04%
- 10Y*
- —
GDXU
- 1D
- 8.84%
- 1M
- -50.11%
- YTD
- -56.00%
- 6M
- -55.92%
- 1Y
- 30.95%
- 3Y*
- 37.87%
- 5Y*
- -14.73%
- 10Y*
- —
HIMS vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIMS Hims & Hers Health, Inc. | -17.40% | 34.28% | 171.69% | 38.85% | -2.14% | -55.14% | 38.78% |
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 | -56.00% | 796.47% | -18.60% | -21.36% | -62.82% | -54.93% | 4.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIMS and GDXU is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIMS vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank
HIMS
GDXU
HIMS vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIMS | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.18 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | 0.37 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 0.80 | -1.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIMS vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIMS drawdown since its inception was -87.29%, smaller than the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMS and GDXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIMS | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.29% | -94.39% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.06% | -83.97% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.88% | -83.97% | +5.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.88% | -92.44% | +13.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.98% | -79.58% | +18.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.23% | -69.77% | +26.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.06% | 38.59% | +9.47% |
Volatility
HIMS vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) is 21.36%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a volatility of 54.28%. This indicates that HIMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIMS | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.36% | 54.28% | -32.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.20% | 123.72% | -56.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.46% | 142.00% | -45.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.26% | 111.92% | -28.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.20% | 110.82% | -33.62% |
Dividends
HIMS vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison
Neither HIMS nor GDXU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HIMS and GDXU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXU has higher volatility (54.28%) compared to HIMS (21.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMS dropped -87.29% vs GDXU's -94.39%.
GDXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIMS and GDXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer