HIMFX vs. AHMFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HIMFX (American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3) and AHMFX (American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2) are both High Yield Muni funds from Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HIMFX returned 1.81%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for AHMFX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HIMFX charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for AHMFX.

Performance

HIMFX vs. AHMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HIMFX having a 2.37% return and AHMFX slightly lower at 2.33%.

HIMFX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: 2.89%
• 1Y: 8.77%
• 3Y*: 6.04%
• 5Y*: 1.81%
• 10Y*: —

AHMFX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 2.83%
• 1Y: 8.64%
• 3Y*: 6.40%
• 5Y*: 1.91%
• 10Y*: 3.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMFX vs. AHMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HIMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3	2.37%	4.69%	6.23%	7.89%	-12.36%	5.60%	4.74%	8.92%	1.91%	8.22%
AHMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2	2.33%	6.03%	6.45%	7.04%	-12.44%	5.49%	4.61%	9.12%	1.80%	8.12%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMFX and AHMFX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017	1.00

The correlation between HIMFX and AHMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HIMFX vs. AHMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMFX

HIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 79
HIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
HIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
HIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
HIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
HIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

AHMFX

AHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 78
AHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMFX vs. AHMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIMFX	AHMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	2.82	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.69	4.63	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.69	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	3.12	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.37	11.16	+0.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIMFX vs. AHMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the AHMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMFX and AHMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIMFX	AHMFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	2.82	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.39	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	1.54	-0.69

Drawdowns

HIMFX vs. AHMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMFX drawdown since its inception was -17.57%, roughly equal to the maximum AHMFX drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMFX and AHMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIMFX	AHMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.57%	-17.65%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.76%	-2.76%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.17%	-6.20%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.57%	-17.65%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.17%	-2.37%	-0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.77%	0.77%	0.00%

Volatility

HIMFX vs. AHMFX - Volatility Comparison

American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) have volatilities of 1.11% and 1.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIMFX	AHMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.11%	1.11%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.24%	2.22%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.08%	3.06%	+0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.82%	4.86%	-0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.60%	4.55%	+0.05%

HIMFX vs. AHMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMFX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than AHMFX's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIMFX vs. AHMFX - Dividend Comparison

HIMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than AHMFX's 4.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AHMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2	4.12%	5.58%	4.04%	2.97%	2.71%	3.44%	3.60%	3.68%	3.88%	4.19%	3.74%	4.19%
HIMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3	4.23%	4.32%	3.83%	3.71%	2.80%	3.54%	3.73%	3.49%	3.99%	3.61%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIMFX and AHMFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, HIMFX and AHMFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HIMFX or AHMFX?

AHMFX has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to HIMFX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMFX dropped -17.57% vs AHMFX's -17.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HIMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.